COMPARISON OF QTc DURATION ON ELECTROCARDIOGRAM BETWEEN PATIENTS OF LIVER CIRRHOSIS AND NON CIRRHOTIC CONTROLS

ECG Changes in Cirrhosis

Authors

  • Maj Muhammad Umair specialist, CMH Landi Kotal
  • Malik Nadeem Azam Combined Military Hospital Peshawar
  • Muhammad Omer Heavy Industries Taxilla Hospital
  • Junaid Mansoor Combined Military Hospital Peshawar
  • Hina Khan Amanat Eye Hospital Rawalpindi
  • Kukab Nadeem Combined Military Hospital Landi Kotal

Keywords:

Cirrhosis, Electrocardiogram, QTc interval.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the QTc duration on electrocardiogram (ECG) of patients of cirrhosis (hep B and C origin) with non cirrhotic controls.
Study Design: Case control study.
Place and duration of study: The study was carried out at the Department of Medicine, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from 8th Feb 2009 to 8th Aug 2009.
Material and Method: After meeting the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 80 cirrhotic patients were enrolled in group-I and equal number of non cirrhotic controls were enrolled in group-II. Three 12 lead ECG recording were taken for each patient, 5 minutes apart, and QTc value was calculated for each ECG and then mean of the three was used for the analysis. A QTc value more than 0.44 seconds was taken as prolonged.
Results: The mean QTc interval on electrocardiogram in group-I i.e. cirrhotic was 0.4603 seconds (SD±0.1312) and mean QTc interval on electrocardiogram in group-II i.e. noncirrhotic was 0.407 seconds (SD±0.029). These findings were statistically significant (p value < 0.001).
Conclusion: Cirrhotic patients have prolonged QTc interval as compared to noncirrhotic controls.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2012

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Umair MM, Azam MN, Omer M, Mansoor J, Khan H, Nadeem K. COMPARISON OF QTc DURATION ON ELECTROCARDIOGRAM BETWEEN PATIENTS OF LIVER CIRRHOSIS AND NON CIRRHOTIC CONTROLS: ECG Changes in Cirrhosis. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2012 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Jul. 13];62(4):473-6. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/1910