Improved Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Accuracy: The Benefits of Combined Supine   and Prone Acquisition

Saima  Seher

doi:10.51253/pafmj.v76iSUPPL-4.14174

Authors

Saima Seher Department of Nuclear Cardiology, Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology, Rawalpindi/National Institute of Heart Diseases/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76iSUPPL-4.14174

Keywords:

Coronary artery disease, Myocardial perfusion imaging, Prone position, sensitivity, specificity, Supine position

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether prone imaging enhances attenuation correction (AC), thereby improving the specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) without compromising sensitivity.

Study Design: Analytical Cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Nuclear Department, Army Cardiac Hospital Lahore; from Dec 2023-Jun 2024.

Methodology: One hundred and twenty four patients with fixed or reversible inferior wall perfusion abnormalities and suspected or proven ischemic heart disease were included in the study using non-probability sequential sampling. All patients underwent supine stress/rest SPECT MPI followed by additional stress prone SPECT. Patients with normal MPI and normal perfusion of inferior wall were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy of prone imaging against the coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined based on sensitivity and specificity.

Result: The mean age of the 124 patients who were enrolled was 57.2±11.3 years; 86(69.4%) of them were men. The mean LVEF was 54.4±7.8%, and the mean BMI was 26.6±3.0 kg/m². Among the patients, 69.4% had hypertension and 68.5% had diabetes mellitus. Prone MPI showed an overall accuracy of 78.0%, sensitivity of 64.2%, specificity of 87.7%, positive predictive value of 86.0%, and negative predictive value of 67.6%. Accuracy for supine fixed perfusion abnormalities was 74.0%, but accuracy for reversible defects was 75.0%. Consequently, prone imaging demonstrated a more reliable and balanced diagnostic performance for the detection of CAD.

Conclusion: Combining MPI with prone and supine imaging improved diagnostic accuracy and specificity without compromising sensitivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Pelletier-Galarneau M, Cabra A, Szabo E, et al. Real-world evidence study on the impact of SPECT MPI, PET MPI, cCTA and stress echocardiography on downstream healthcare utilisation in patients with coronary artery disease in the US. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024; 24: 543.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04225-y

2. Taasan V, Wokhlu A, Taasan MV, Dusaj RS, Mehta A, Kraft S, et al. Comparative accuracy of supine-only and combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging in men. J Nucl Cardiol 2016; 23(6): 1470-1476.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0358-2

3. Tawakol AE, Tantawy HM, Elashmawy RE, Abdelhafez YG, Elsayed YM. Added value of CT attenuation correction and prone positioning in improving breast and subdiaphragmatic attenuation in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med Technol 2021; 49(1): 23-29.

https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.255943

4. Alqahtani FF. SPECT/CT and PET/CT, related radiopharmaceuticals, and areas of application and comparison. Saudi Pharm J. 2023; 31(2): 312-328.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2022.12.013

5. Johnson SG. Motion Artifacts in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Nucl Med Technol 2025; 53(2): 138-139.

https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.269853

6. Lee TC, Alessio AM, Miyaoka RM, Kinahan PE. Morphology supporting function: attenuation correction for SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 60(1): 25.

7. Hatipoğlu F, Çetin N. Clinical utility of CT-based attenuation-correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2023; 32(2): 138.

https://doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.68094

8. Abadie B, Liga R, Buechel R, Giannopoulos AA, Pizzi MN, Roque A, et al. Patient centric performance and interpretation of SPECT and SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract 2025; 3(1): qyaf043.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf043

9. Dilawar H, Habib S, Iqbal J, Hadi I, Abdul Rehman T, Ahmed A,et al. Role of prone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. Nucl Med Radiat Ther 2023; 14(1): 525.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2918437/v1

10. Gheisari F, Kamali M, Liyaghat M, Atefi M, Motamedi A. Optimizing myocardial perfusion scan quality with SPECT: a hybrid systematic narrative review. J Rev Med Sci 2025; 5(1): 1.

https://doi.org/10.22034/jrms.2025.498154.1036

11. Ceylan Gunay E, Erdogan A, Yalcin H, Ozcan Kara P. Prone imaging allows efficient radiopharmaceutical usage by obviating the necessity of a rest study in Tc-99m-MIBI myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun 2011; 32(4): 284-288.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e32834462ee

12. Duvall WL, Wijetunga MN, Klein TM, Razzouk L, Godbold J, Croft LB, et al. The prognosis of a normal stress-only Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging study. J Nucl Cardiol 2010; 17(3): 370-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9210-x

13. Arsanjani R, Hayes SW, Fish M, Shalev A, Nakanishi R, Thomson LE, et al. Two-position supine/prone myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging improves visual inter-observer correlation and agreement. J Nucl Cardiol 2014; 21(4): 703-711.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9895-3

14. Stathaki M, Koukouraki S, Papadaki E, Tsaroucha A, Karkavitsas N. The benefits of prone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in reducing both artifact defects and patient radiation exposure. Arq Bras Cardiol 2015; 105: 345-352.

https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150122

15. Farrell MB. Combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging: enhancing diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med Technol 2024; 52(4): 328-330. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.268017

16. Nakaya K, Onoguchi M, Nishimura Y, Kiso K, Otsuka H, Nouno Y, et al. Comparison between prone and upright imaging of the inferior wall using 201TlCl myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med Technol 2017; 45(4): 304-308.

https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.117.197632

17. Kumar A, Singh H, Kaur K, Kumar S, Kaur H, Mittal BR. Comparative analysis of occupational whole-body effective dose and imaging time in myocardial perfusion imaging: dedicated cardiac CZT-SPECT versus conventional SPECT/CT. Clin Transl Imaging 2025; 1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-025-00704-0

18. Costa TO, Rocha MD, Camargo RA, Macedo CR. Incremental determinants of the combined supine-prone protocol for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Arq Bras Cardiol Imagem Cardiovasc 2023; 36(3).

https://doi.org/10.36660/abcimg.20230060i

19. Mirshahvalad SA, Chavoshi M, Hekmat S. Diagnostic performance of prone-only myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary angiography in detecting coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2022; 29(3): 1339-1351.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02376-x

20. Sayed AI. Gender differences in coronary artery disease, clinical characteristics, and angiographic features in the Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia. Cureu 2022; 14(10): e30239.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30239

21. Gutstein A, Solodky A, Mats I, et al. Feasibility of myocardial perfusion SPECT with prone and half-time imaging. Nucl Med Commun 2011; 32: 386-391.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e328343d68e