Effect of Positioning on Oxygen Saturation Among Neonates with Respiratory Distress

Kalsoom Shahnawaz Lashari; Shaista Gul Lashari; Abdul Hameed Radhan; Zamir Ahmed Qambrani; Khuda Bux Khoso; Farzana Shaikh

doi:10.51253/pafmj.v76iSUPPL-6.13976

Authors

Kalsoom Shahnawaz Lashari Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan
Shaista Gul Lashari Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan
Abdul Hameed Radhan Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan
Zamir Ahmed Qambrani Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan
Khuda Bux Khoso Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan
Farzana Shaikh Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76iSUPPL-6.13976

Keywords:

Infant; Oximetry; Oxygen Saturation; Prone Position; Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Abstract

Objective: To determine the impact of the prone position versus the supine position on oxygen saturation (SpO2) in children with respiratory distress.

Study design: Qausi-experimental study

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan, from Apr to Sep 2025.

Methodology: The study enrolled a sample size of 100 neonates, who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) with respiratory distress. Following the initial stabilization, all the neonates were subjected to supplementary oxygen in both supine and prone positions. Demographic and clinical data were gathered. Statistical analysis was done through Statistical Package For Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.00 with independent sample t-test to compare the mean SpO2 between positions where a p-value <0.05 was taken as significant.

Results: The infants in the prone positioning group gradually experienced an increase in mean SpO₂, which reached 95.02 ± 2.15% at 90 minutes, while the supine group's values stayed close to the baseline. A larger number of infants in prone position were able to get SpO₂ ≥92% starting from the 30-minute mark (p < 0.001), which proved that there was a continuous and statistically significant improvement in their oxygenation.

Conclusion: Prone position had a significant positive effect in terms of oxygen saturation in neonates with respiratory distress as compared to the supine posture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Legesse BT, Wondie WT, Mekonen WM, Mekonnin GB. Predictors of mortality among neonates admitted with hypothermia and respiratory distress syndrome at West Oromia tertiary hospitals, retrospective follow-up study, 2023. J Neonatal Nurs. 2025; 31(3): 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2025.101673

2. Stylianou-Riga P, Boutsikou T, Kouis P, Kinni P, Krokou M, Ioannou A, et al. Maternal and neonatal risk factors for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in term neonates in Cyprus: a prospective case-control study. Ital J Pediatr. 2021; 47(1): 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01086-5

3. Chen IL, Chen HL. New developments in neonatal respiratory management. Pediatr Neonatol. 2022; 63(4): 341-347.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.03.003

4. Dyess N, Kinsella JP, Parker TA. Acute neonatal respiratory disorders. In: Gleason CA, Devaskar SU, editors. Avery's diseases of the newborn. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2024. p. 594-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-82823-9.00042-8

5. Poets CF, Lim K, Cramer S, Marshall A, Gale T, Dargaville PA. Oxygenation and intermittent hypoxia in supine vs prone position in very preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2020; 109(8): 1677-1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15353

6. Yang S, Sun Q, Yuan X, Wang J, Wang H, Hu W, et al. Effect of prone position on ventilation-perfusion matching in patients with moderate to severe ARDS with different clinical phenotypes. Respir Res. 2025; 26(1): 70.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03154-4

7. Guérin C. Prone ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir Rev. 2014; 23(132): 249-257. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1183/09059180.00001114

8. La Vita CJ, De Santis Santiago RR. Prone position: a strategy in expansion? Respir Care. 2021; 66(5): 884-885.

https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09131

9. Qin W, Mao L, Shen Y, Zhao L. Prone position in the mechanical ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2024; 12: 1293453.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1293453

10. Daas H, Shaikh SKN. Effect of prone versus supine position on oxygen saturation in patients with respiratory distress in neonates. Pak J Med Sci. 2011; 27(5): 1098-1101.

11. Fridrich P, Krafft P, Hochleuthner H, Mauritz W. The effects of long-term prone positioning in patients with trauma-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesth Analg. 1996; 83(6): 1206-1211.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199612000-00013

12. Chacko J, Pawar S, Seppelt I, Brar G. Prone ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. In: Kulkarni RL, Dixit SB, Kulkarni AP, editors. Controversies in critical care. Springer Nature; 2023. p. 47-54.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9940-6_6

13. Amiri B, Zemková E. Diaphragmatic breathing exercises in recovery from fatigue-induced changes in spinal mobility and postural stability: a study protocol. Front Physiol. 2023; 14: 1251978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1251978

14. Inoue R, Nagamine Y, Ohtsuka M, Goto T. Association between diaphragmatic dysfunction after adult cardiovascular surgery and prognosis of mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024; 38(3): 701-707. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2023.10.024

15. Kaltsogianni O, Jenkinson A, Harris C, Jeffreys E, Sikdar O, Greenough A, et al. Closed-loop automated oxygen control in late preterm and term, ventilated infants: a randomised controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2025; 114(6): 1222-1228.

https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.17549

16. Castro ES, Bacil LF, Almeida FL, Andreazza MG, Alves RA, Valderramas SR. Premature newborn positionings and physiologic parameters: a randomized clinical study. Fisioter Mov. 2023; 36: e36121.

https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2023.36.121.en

17. Hassan MHM, El-Sakka ASE, Ahmed DAH, Alhassanin AHAS. Cardiorespiratory assessment of preterm and near term neonates on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in different body positions. QJM. 2024; 117(Suppl 2): hcae175.760.

https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.760

18. Shamkhi HAH, Shawq AH. Positioning preterm newborns for cardiorespiratory stability: a global insight. Acad Open. 2024; 9(2): e24090204. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.9.2024.9063

19. Susanthy M, Rustina Y. Efektivitas posisi prone dibandingkan posisi supine terhadap fungsi fisiologis bayi prematur. J Telenursing. 2022; 4(1): 243-251.

https://doi.org/10.31539/joting.v4i1.3376