Bridging Gaps in Teaching and Learning Biochemistry: A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i2.9994Keywords:
Biochemistry, Learning, Teaching, Medical education, Qualitative research, Biological sciencesAbstract
Objective: To identify the sources of learning gaps in biochemistry teaching and learning and explore new teaching and learning strategies, considering the students' perceptions and felt needs.
Study Design: Exploratory qualitative study (Social-constructivist philosophical worldview).
Place and Duration of Study: Public Sector Medical College, Pakistan, from Jul 2020 to Jul 2021.
Methodology: Students from all five years of medical college were recruited voluntarily after their written consent. Ten focus group discussions were conducted, each consisting of approximately 8 to 12 participants. Each session was recorded and then later transcribed verbatim. Verbatim FGDs were reviewed, and codes were given as the concept became recognizable. A code structure was developed via an inductive approach, and then sub-themes and themes were generated.
Results: Ten major themes were generated from the FGDs. These themes were teaching, students’ motivation, clinical irrelevance, educational needs, transition difficulty, attitudes, student support, senior peers, curriculum coherence, and assessment. These themes were further elucidated to explain the causes of the learning gaps and provide suggestions.
Conclusion: This study concludes that teaching, students’ motivation, clinical irrelevance, educational needs, difficulty in transition, student attitude, student support, senior peers, curriculum coherence, and assessment are the potential sources of the learning gap to achieve intended learning outcomes of biochemistry for medical students.
Downloads
References
Malau-Aduli BS, Alele FO, Heggarty P, Teague PA, Sen Gupta T, Hays R, et al. Perceived clinical relevance and retention of basic sciences across the medical education continuum. Adv Physiol Educ 2019; 43(3): 293-299.
http://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00012.2019
Mbiydzenyuy NE, Chisompola NK. Basic Medical Sciences in Medical Education: A Thought for African Medical Schools. Med Sci Educ 2020; 31(1): 253-256.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01145-2
Afshar M, Han Z. Teaching and Learning Medical Biochemistry: Perspectives from a Student and an Educator. Med Sci Educ 2014; 24(3): 339-341. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-014-0004-7
Pienta NJ. The Role of Chemistry Education for Medical Preprofessionals. J Chem Educ 2017; 94(8): 981-982.
http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00527
Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Tackett SA, Chen BY. Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015.
Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN, et al. Flexner revisited: the role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Acad Med 2010; 85(2): 349-55. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88b09
Woods NN. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007; 41(12): 1173-1177. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02911.x
Sockalingam S, Hawa R, Al-Battran M, Abbey SE, Zaretsky A. Preparing international medical graduates for psychiatry residency: a multi-site needs assessment. Acad Psychiatry 2012; 36(4): 277-281. http://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.09110219
Oskvarek J, Braunstein S, Farnan J, Ferguson MK, Hahn O, Henderson T, et al. Medical Student Knowledge of Oncology and Related Disciplines: a Targeted Needs Assessment. J Cancer Educ 2016; 31(3): 529-532.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0876-2
Dandekar SP, Maksane SN, Mckinley DW. Design of Medical Biochemistry Undergraduate Laboratory Based Curriculum to Address Unmet Needs. South-East Asian J Med Educ 2017;11(1). 43-53. http://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v11i1.8
D’Souza JM, Raghavendra U, D’Souza DH, D’Souza ND. Teaching learning of biochemistry in undergraduate medical curriculum: Perceptions and opinions of medical students. Educ Med J 2013; 5(2): e45-53. http://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v5i2.109
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications; 2016.
Krueger RA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications; 2014.
Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 2022; 56(3): 1391-1412. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Hafeez A, Jamil B, Khan AF. Roadblocks to Integration; Faculty's perspective on transition from Traditional to Integrated Medical Curriculum. Pak J Med Sci 2021; 37(3): 788-793.
http://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.3217
Dahdal S. Using the WhatsApp social media application for active learning. J Educ Technol Sys 2020; 49(2): 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520928307
Radmacher SA, Martin DJ. Identifying significant predictors of student evaluations of faculty through hierarchical regression analysis. J Psychol 2001; 135(3): 259-268.
http://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603696
Krueger PM, Neutens J, Bienstock J, Cox S, Erickson S, Goepfert A, et al. To the point: reviews in medical education teaching techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191(2): 408-411.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.003
Custers EJ, Ten Cate OT. Medical clerks' attitudes towards the basic sciences: a longitudinal and a cross-sectional comparison between students in a conventional and an innovative curriculum. Med Teach 2007; 29(8): 772-777.
http://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701509696
West M, Mennin SP, Kaufman A, Galey W. Medical students' attitudes toward basic sciences: influence of a primary care curriculum. Med Educ 1982; 16(4): 188-191.
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01246.x
McPhail G. The search for deep learning: A curriculum coherence model. J Curr Stud 2020; 53(4):420-434.
http://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1748231
Heflin H, Shewmaker J, Nguyen J. Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Comput Educ 2017; 107: 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
