Analgesic efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Block versus Pudendal Nerve Block in BRAKA - I Repair for Paediatric Hypospadias

Authors

  • Abrar Ahmed Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Syed Qasim Rizvi Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Saad Sikander Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Khalid Buland Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Huzaifa Shareef Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Saad Farooq Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i1.9445

Keywords:

Analgesia, Caudal block, Children, Pudendal nerve block

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided caudal versus pudendal nerve block analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing hypospadias.

Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan from Mar to Sep 2022.

Methodology: Paediatric patients with ages ranging from 4-12 years with ASA Grade I/II planned for hypospadias repair
were included. Sixty-eight patients were divided into Group-C (caudal block) and Group-P (pudendal nerve block), after
randomization. Group-C patients received ultrasound-guided caudal block while pudendal nerve blockade was performed
under ultrasound guidance in Group- P. Demographic variables, requirement of rescue analgesics, CHEOPS scoring at 0, 1, 2,6 and 12 hours, and complications in the intraoperative period were recorded.

Results: Pain scores at the 6th and 12th hour were significantly reduced in Group-P compared to Group-C. Requirement of
analgesia was lesser in Group P 01(2.9%) compared to 11(32.3%) in Group C with a p-value of 0.006. Out of 34 patients in
Group-C 07(20.6%), patients encountered complications compared to Group-P, which had no complications.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block is superior to caudal block in providing adequate perioperative
analgesia with fewer complications and decreased requirement of additional analgesic supplements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ponde V. Recent trends in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Indian J

Anaesth 2019; 63(9): 746-753.

https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_502_19.

Greaney D, Everett T. Paediatric regional anaesthesia: updates in

central neuraxial techniques and thoracic and abdominal blocks.

BJA Educ 2019; 19(4): 126-134.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2018.12.003.

Kalava A, Pribish AM, Wiegand LR. Pudendal nerve blocks in

men undergoing urethroplasty: a case series. Roman J Anaesth

Intens Care 2017; 24(2): 159-162.

https://doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.klv.

Okoro C, Huang H, Cannon S, Low D, Liston DE, Richards MJ,

et al. The pudendal nerve block for ambulatory urology: what’s

old is new again. A quality improvement project. J Pediatr Urol

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.025.

Guay J, Suresh S, Kopp S. The use of ultrasound guidance for

perioperative neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks in children.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019(2): CD011436.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011436.pub3.

Bomberg H, Wetjen L, Wagenpfeil S, Schöpe J, Kessler P, Wulf H,

et al. Risks and Benefits of Ultrasound, Nerve Stimulation, and

Their Combination for Guiding Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A

Retrospective Registry Analysis. Anesth Analg 2018; 127(4):

-1043. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000003480.

Kil HK. Caudal and epidural blocks in infants and small children:

historical perspective and ultrasound-guided approaches.

Korean J Anesthesiol 2018; 71(6): 430-439.

https://doi.org/ 10.4097/kja.d.18.00109.

Ozen V, Yigit D. Caudal epidural block versus ultrasound-guided

dorsal penile nerve block for pediatric distal hypospadias

surgery: A prospective, observational study. J Pediatr Urol 2020;

(4): 438.e1-438.e8.

https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.009.

Shamim F, Ullah H, Khan FA. Postoperative pain assessment

using four behavioral scales in Pakistani children undergoing

elective surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2015; 9(2): 174-178.

https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.152874.

Munevveroglu C, Gunduz M. Postoperative pain management

for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods. Pak J

Med Sci 2020; 36(2): 91-95.

https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505.

Dontukurthy S, Tobias JD. Update on Local Anesthetic Toxicity,

Prevention and Treatment During Regional Anesthesia in Infants

and Children. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2021; 26(5): 445-454.

https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-26.5.445.

Ahmed WA, Shokier MH, Kasem AA, El Aziz MH, Saed SG.

Comparative study between ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve

block and caudal epidural block anesthesia in children

undergoing hypospadias surgery. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 2021;

: 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-021-00172-4.

Ozen V. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of USguided caudal block and US-guided pudendal nerve block in

circumcision. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75(10): e14366.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14366.

Jain D, Hussain SY, Ayub A. Comparative evaluation of

landmark technique and ultrasound-guided caudal epidural

injection in pediatric population: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Paediatr Anaesth 2022; 32(1): 35-42.

https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14332.

Boretsky KR, Camelo C, Waisel DB, Falciola V, Sullivan C,

Brusseau E, et al. Confirmation of success rate of landmark-based

caudal blockade in children using ultrasound: A prospective

analysis. Paediatr Anaesth 2020; 30(6): 671-675.

https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13865.

Aksu C, Akay MA, Şen MC, Gürkan Y. Ultrasound-guided dorsal

penile nerve block vs neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve

block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A

prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Paediatr Anaesth

; 29(10): 1046-1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13727.

Hecht S, Piñeda J, Bayne A. Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Block

Is a Viable Alternative to Caudal Block for Hypospadias Surgery:

A Single-Surgeon Pilot Study. Urology 2018; 113: 192-196.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.006.

Choudhry DK, Heredia L, Brenn BR, Brown M, Carvalho NF,

Whaley MC, et al. Nerve stimulation guided bilateral pudendal

nerve block versus landmark-based caudal block for

hypospadias repair in young children: a prospective,

randomized, pragmatic trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47(12):

-748. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103680.

Çevikkalp E, Baytar Ç. Comparison of postoperative analgesic

effectiveness of caudal block, dorsal penile nerve block, and

pudendal nerve block in children undergoing circumcision.

Cukurova Med J 2022; 47(1): 169-174.

https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1020556.

Boretsky KR. Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Advances. Curr

Anesthesiol Rep 2019; 9(2): 100-109.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-019-00318-z

Downloads

Published

28-02-2024

How to Cite

Ahmed, A., Rizvi, S. Q., Sikander, M. S., Buland, K., Shareef, M. H., & Farooq, M. S. (2024). Analgesic efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Block versus Pudendal Nerve Block in BRAKA - I Repair for Paediatric Hypospadias. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 74(1), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i1.9445

Issue

Section

Original Articles