Outcomes of Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh Hernioplasty for Ventral Abdominal Hernias

Saadan Saleem; Syeda Rifaat Qamar  Naqvi; Aimen  Luqman; Hasnain  Razzaque; Mahlail Hassan  Khan; Qazi Tafheem Ul  Haq

doi:10.51253/pafmj.v74i6.8732

Authors

Saadan Saleem Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
Syeda Rifaat Qamar Naqvi Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
Aimen Luqman Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore Pakistan
Hasnain Razzaque Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Kohat/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
Mahlail Hassan Khan Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
Qazi Tafheem Ul Haq Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i6.8732

Keywords:

Herniorrhaphy, Hernia repair, Hernioplasty, Onlay, Sublay, Ventral hernia.

Abstract

Objective: To compare surgical outcomes of Onlay versus Sublay technique of mesh hernioplasty among patients with ventral abdominal hernia.

Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Oct 2021 to Mar 2022.

Methodology: A total of 78 patients were selected, using convenience sampling, with reducible incisional, paraumbilical, supraumbilical or epigastric hernia, with a hernial defect measuring ≥2 cm. All preoperative parameters were recorded, and postoperative outcomes were monitored on follow-up at 2 weeks, 1 month and 2 months. Data was analyzed for statistical significance with p-value ≤0.05 being considered significant.

Results: Open Onlay repair was performed on 41(52.6%) patients whereas the remaining 37(47.4%) cases had open Sublay mesh hernioplasty. The commonest ventral hernia types were paraumbilical 43(55.1%) and incisional 28(35.9%). Sublay procedure lasted for a significantly longer duration (p<0.001) but wound infections (OR: 1.67) and seromas (OR: 1.50) were slightly more frequent among the Onlay repair group (p=0.372 and p=0.521 respectively) whereas postoperative pain and wound dehiscence showed a similar rate of occurrence. Recurrence was more common after Sublay repair (14, 38%) as compared to Onlay 10(24.4%).

Conclusion: The comparison between Onlay and Sublay mesh hernioplasty showed comparable surgical outcomes, with each technique presenting distinct advantages. While Sublay procedures took longer and had higher recurrence rates, they showed slightly lower wound complications. The choice of technique should be individualized based on patient factors and surgeon expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Le Huu Nho R, Mege D, Ouaïssi M, Sielezneff I, Sastre B. Frequency and prevention of ventral incisional hernia. J Visc Surg 2012; 149(5 Suppl): e3-14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.05.004

Liang MK, Holihan JL, Itani K, Alawadi ZM, Gonzalez JR, Askenasy EP, et al. Ventral hernia management: expert consensus guided by systematic review. Ann Surg 2017; 265(1): 80-89.

http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701

Rhemtulla IA, Fischer JP. Retromuscular Sublay technique for ventral hernia repair. Semin Plast Surg 2018; 32(3): 120-126.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1666800

Köckerling F. Onlay technique in incisional hernia repair-a systematic review. Front Surg 2018; 5: 71.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00071

Timmermans L, de Goede B, van Dijk SM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Meta-analysis of Sublay versus Onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery. Am J Surg 2014; 207(6): 980-988.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.043

Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M. One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. Hernia 2010; 14(6): 575-582.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0684-3

Bessa SS, El-Gendi AM, Ghazal AH, Al-Fayoumi TA. Comparison between the short-term results of Onlay and Sublay mesh placement in the management of uncomplicated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 2015; 19(1): 141-146.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1183-2

Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik R, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic Onlay and Sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 390(10094): 567-576.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6

Davila DG, Parikh N, Frelich MJ, Goldblatt MI. The increased cost of ventral hernia recurrence: a cost analysis. Hernia 2016; 20(6): 811-817.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1537-0

Ahmed M, Mehboob M. Comparisons of Onlay versus Sublay mesh fixation technique in ventral abdominal wall incisional hernia repair. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2019; 29(9): 819-822.

https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2019.09.819

Ibrahim A, El-Gammal A, Mohamed Heikal M. Comparative study between 'Onlay' and 'Sublay' hernioplasty in the treatment of uncomplicated ventral hernia. Menoufia Med J 2015; 28: 11-16.

Saeed N, Iqbal SA, Shaikh BA, Baqai F. Comparison between Onlay and Sublay methods of mesh repair of incisional hernia. JPMI J Postgrad Med Inst 2014; 28(4).

Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Arndt M, Chevrel JP, et al. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts' meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001; 386(1): 65-73.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s004230000173

Sevinç B, Okuş A, Ay S, Aksoy N. Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of Onlay and Sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia. Turk J Surg 2018; 34(1): 17-20. https://doi.org/10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3709

Naz A, Abid K, Syed AA, Baig NN, Umer MF, Mehdi H. Comparative evaluation of Sublay versus Onlay mesh repair for ventral hernia. J Pak Med Assoc 2018; 68(5): 705-708.

Ibrahim R, Abounozha S, Kheder A, Alshahri T. Frequency of seroma in Sublay versus Onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Med Surg 2021; 61: 155-157.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.054

RM N, Muralidhar S, Shetty H, VV V. Onlay versus Sublay mesh repair for ventral hernia. 2018; 5(3): 4.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180432

Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK, et al. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg 2016; 40(1): 89-https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3262-9

Wéber G, Baracs J, Horváth OP. "Onlay" mesh provides significantly better results than "Sublay" reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh—results of a five-years follow-up. Magy Seb 2010; 63(5): 302-311.

https://doi.org/10.1556/MaSeb.63.2010.5.3