Use of Intravenous Ephedrine in Crystalloid Preload to Decrease the Preload Volume Requirement Before Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Section

Authors

  • Adeela Khan Jadoon Department of Anesthesiology, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Humayun Munir Tarar Department of Anesthesiology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Maryam Jadoon National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad Pakistan
  • Shahzad Bashir Department of Anesthesiology, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Sana Abbas Department of Anesthesiology, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Aqsa Jadoon Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i4.8553

Keywords:

Bolus, Ephedrine, Gestation, Hypotension, Normal saline

Abstract

Objective: To determine the use of intravenous Ephedrine in crystalloid preload before spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean section to prevent hypotension to avoid detrimental effects of hypotension in obstetric patients.

Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study:  Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Sep 2021 to Feb 2022.

Methodology: A total of (250) full-term parturients (>36 weeks gestation) with an age range of 20 to 35 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section belonging to the American Society of anaesthesiologists classification II were included in the study. Bradycardia and tachycardia were endorsed as <30% or >30% of baseline respectively whereas <20% decline in systolic blood pressure was labeled as hypotension. Hemodynamic profile, nausea, vomiting, and Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration scores were recorded.

Results: A total of 250 full-term pregnant patients with a mean age of 25.23±4.15. belonging to American Society of anaesthesiologists II in enrolled in the study. Among Group–E 18(14.4%) experienced hypotension whereas 67(53.6%) participants had a frequency of hypotension in Group–F (p-value <0.001), hence greater number of parturients in Group–F 67(53.6%) were administered ≥ 10 mg rescue Ephedrine bolus as compared to 18(14.4%) participants of Group–E (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: This study concluded that prophylactic administration of intravenous Ephedrine as a bolus dose can significantly alleviate the frequency of hypotension in obstetric patients with negligible adverse effects profile on the mother and neonate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yu C, Gu J, Liao Z, Feng S. Prediction of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section: a systematic review of prospective observational studies. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021; 47(1): 103175.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103175

Kilinç N, Deniz MN, Erhan E. Crystalloid preload versus crystalloid coload during spinal anesthesia for ureterorenoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Ege Tip Derg 2020; 59(3): 181-187.

https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.789190

Gousheh M, Akhondzade R, Asl Aghahoseini H, Olapour A, Rashidi M. The effects of pre-spinal anesthesia administration of crystalloid and colloid solutions on hypotension in elective cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med 2018; 8(4): 45.

https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.69446

Fan QQ, Wang YH, Fu JW, Dong HL, Yang MP, Liu DD, et al. Comparison of two vasopressor protocols for preventing hypotension post-spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J 2021; 134(7): 792-799.

https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001404

Ni H, Liu H, Zhang J, Peng K, Ji F. Crystalloid coload reduced the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, when compared to crystalloid preload: A meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3462527

Artawan I, Sarim B, Sagita S, Etty Dedi M. Comparison of the effect of preloading and co-loading with crystalloid fluid on the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Bali J Anesthesiol 2020; 4(1): 3.

https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_15_19

Ahmed H, Hossam M, Adel A. Volume preload versus ephedrine infusion for prevention of hypotension due to spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Open J Anesthesiol 2016; 6(3): 37-44.

https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2016.63007

Chooi C, Cox JJ, Lumb RS, Middleton P, Chemali M, Emmett RS, et al. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 7(7): CD002251.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Higgins N, Fitzgerald PC, van Dyk D, Dyer RA, Rodriguez N, McCarthy RJ et al. The effect of prophylactic phenylephrine and ephedrine infusions on umbilical artery blood pH in women with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind trial. Anesth Analg 2018; 126(6): 1999-2006.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002524

Gousheh MR, Akhondzade R, Asl Aghahoseini H, Olapour A, Rashidi M. The effects of pre-spinal anesthesia administration of crystalloid and colloid solutions on hypotension in elective cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med 2018; 8(4): e69446.

https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.69446

Šklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetrics: prevention and therapy. Acta Clin Croat 2019; 58(Suppl 1): 90-95.

https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13

Shitemaw T, Aregawi A, Fentie F, Jemal B. Prophylactic ephedrine to prevent postspinal hypotension following spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean section: a prospective cohort study in Ethiopia. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2019; 9(2): 75.

https://doi.org/10.4103/joacc.JOACC_14_19

Salama A, Goma H, Abdel-Hamid B. Fluid preloading versus ephedrine in the management of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a comparative study. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol 2016; 9(1): 72.

https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.174750

Jabalameli M, Soltani HA, Hashemi J, Behdad S, Soleimani B. Prevention of post-spinal hypotension using crystalloid, colloid, and ephedrine with three different combinations: A double-blind randomized study. Adv Biomed Res 2012; 1(1): 36.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.100129

Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Lee BB, Lau TK, Gin T. A dose-response study of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2000; 90(6): 1390-1395.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200006000-00024

Tsen LC, Boosalis P, Segal S, Datta S, Bader AM. Hemodynamic effects of simultaneous administration of intravenous ephedrine and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12(5): 378-382.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00176-8

Nazir I, Bhat MA, Qazi S, Buchh VN, Gurcoo SA. Comparison between phenylephrine and ephedrine in preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2012; 2(2): 92-97.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4472.104780

Khan MU, Memon AS, Ishaq M, Aqil M. Preload versus coload and vasopressor requirement for the prevention of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in nonobstetric patients. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015; 25(12): 851-855.

https://doi.org/10.2016/jcpsp.501853

Shang Y, Li H, Ma J, Tan L, Li S, Li P, et al. Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2021; 100(7): e24607.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.000000000002460

Downloads

Published

30-08-2024

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Adeela Khan Jadoon, Humayun Munir Tarar, Maryam Jadoon, Shahzad Bashir, Sana Abbas, Aqsa Jadoon. Use of Intravenous Ephedrine in Crystalloid Preload to Decrease the Preload Volume Requirement Before Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Section. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2024 Aug. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];74(4):1169-72. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/8553