An Experience in Managing an open Fracture Shaft of the Femur Due to a Gunshot with Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.8538Keywords:
Intramedullary nailing, Infection, bone union, Open fractureAbstract
Objective: To evaluate functional outcomes and complications in gunshot femur shaft fractures treated with intramedullary
nailing primarily.
Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthopaedic Combined Military Hospital, Nowshera, Combined Military
Hospital Sialkot, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan 2016 to Dec 2021.
Methodology: A total number of 53 cases of open fracture of the femur shaft due to gunshot were included in the study. After initial wound debridement, an X-ray was taken, and fractures were classified according to the Gustilo–Anderson classification. All fractures were fixed with titanium I/M I/L Nail in static mode by the same orthopaedic surgeon. Rehabilitation was instituted immediately after the operation, and the outcome was assessed in regards to infection, range of motion at the knee, full weight bearing and radiological union achieved.
Results: Thirty-four (64.15%) patients had Type-1 fractures of the femur shaft, and 19(35.8%) patients had Type-2 fractures.
Fracture union was observed in 47(88.67%) patients after three months and 6(11.32%) over the next five months.
Complications were wound infections 5(9.44%), leg length discrepancy 4(7.53%), and non-union 2(3.77%) at six months. In
these two cases, bone grafting was done, and union was achieved.
Conclusion: Primary intramedullary (IM) is the preferred mode of treatment of Type 1 and 2 shafts of femur fractures if early good debridement is done. It avoids secondary procedures, has fewer complications and helps in early mobilization.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abaza R, Lukens-Bull K, Bayouth L, Smotherman C, Tepas J,Crandall M, et al. Gunshot wound incidence as a persistent,
tragic symptom of area deprivation. Surgery 2020; 168(4): 671-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.016.
Poyanli O, Unay K, Akan K, Guven M, Ozkan K. No evidence ofinfection after retrograde nailing of supracondylar femur
fracture in gunshot wounds. J Trauma 2010; 68(4): 970-974.https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3181bb974b.
Goel R, Zhu X, Makhani S, Petersen MR, Josephson CD, KatzLM, et al. Blood transfusions in gunshot-wound-related
emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the UnitedStates. Transfusion 2021; 61(8): 2277-2289.
https://doi.org/10.1111%2Ftrf.16552.
Engelmann EWM, Roche S, Maqungo S, Naude D, Held M.Treating fractures in upper limb gunshot injuries: The Cape
Town experience. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105(3): 517-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.002.
Dougherty PJ, Gherebeh P, Zekaj M, Sethi S, Oliphant B, VaidyaR, et al. Retrograde versus antegrade intramedullary nailing ofgunshot diaphyseal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(12): 3974-3980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3058-8.
Ahmad U, Zaheer M, Sadaqat K, Khalid Z M. Comparison ofOutcome with Retrograde Nailing Versus Locked Compressive
Plating in the Treatment of Extra Articular Supracondylar FemurFractures. Pak J Med Health Sci 2021; 15(12): 3410-3412.
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2115123410.
Fadero PE, Alabi S, Adebule GT, Odunubi OO, Yinusa W,Eyesan SU, et al. Locked intramedullary nailing for the treatment
of femoral shaft fractures: experience and result in 19 cases.Niger J Med 2008; 17(2): 168-172.
Mahajan NP, Kumar GSP, Palange ND, Yadav AK, Harsoor A,Pawar H, et al. Primary intramedullary nailing in compound
Type 1 and 2 femur shaft fractures and their effect on functionaloutcome. J Orthop Spine 2020; 8: 86-90.
http://doi.org/10.4103/JOASP.JOASP_17_20.
Qureshi AR, Shah FA, Ali MA, Naeemullah, Khan UZ. Outcomeof Femoral Shaft Fractures Treated With Interlocking
Nails:Dynamization Mode Versus Static Mode. Isra Medical J2018; 10 (4): 216-219.
Lovelock TM, Broughton NS, Williams CM. The Popularity ofOutcome Measures for Hip and Knee Arthroplasties. J
Arthroplast 2018; 33(1): 273-276.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.024.
Ferracini AM, Faloppa F, Daltro GD, Júnior DCC, dos Reis FB.Prospective and randomized study of patients with open
fractures of the femoral shaft, treated with plate or openintramedullary locked nail. Acta Ortop Bras 2008; 16(5): 301-304.
http://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522008000200008.
Orfi FA, Ahmad A, Orfi M. Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing;Without Image Intensifier, Ortho Table and X-Rays-A
Recognized Technique, A Comparative Study. Professional MedJ 2017; 24(2): 282-287. http://doi.org/10.17957/TPMJ/17.3639.
Ali MA, Hussain SA, Khan MS. Evaluation of results ofinterlocking nails in femur fractures due to high velocity gunshot
injuries. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008; 20(1): 16-19.
Olasnide AA, Ogunlusi JD, Ikem IC. Outcomeof the treatment ofgunshot fractures of lower extremeties with interlocking nails.SA Orthop J 2012; 8: 86-90
Rehman A, Khani GMK, Ahmed N, Ishtiyaque M. Managementof Type-II Open Fracture Shaft of Femur with IntramedullaryInterlocking Nail. J Surg Pak (International) 2013; 18(3): 131-134.
Noumi T, Yokoyama K, Ohtsuka H, Nakamura K, Itoman M.Intramedullary nailing for open fractures of the femoral shaft:
Evaluation of contributing factors on deep infection andnonunion using multivariate analysis. Injury 2005; 36: 1085‑1093.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.09.012.
Brumback RJ, Ellison PS Jr., Poka A, Lakatos R, Bathon GH,Burgess AR, et al. Intramedullary nailing of open fractures of thefemoral shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1324‑1331.
Basha AMI, Reddy KBV, Divvela P. A clinical study of surgicalmanagement of fracture shaft femur in adults with
intramedullary interlocking nail. J Evid Based Med Healthcare2017; 4: 3541-3544. https://doi.org/18410/jebmh/2017/706.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
