Sharing the Experience of Two Hundred Patients in A Novel Cochlear Implant Programme At Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i2.8366Keywords:
Bilateral Deafness, Cochlear implant, Cochlear Round WindowAbstract
Objective: To share our experience of difficulties encountered while implanting different types of cochlear implants and ascertain the affordability of cochlear implant surgery among the Pakistani population to treat sensorineural hearing loss in a novel cochlear implant programme.
Study Design: Retrospective longitudinal study.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of ENT, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Apr 2017 to May 2021.
Methodology: The study included patients who underwent cochlear implant surgeries. Patient demographics and causes of deafness, were collected. Intraoperative difficulties were encountered, and round window accessibility was also recorded.
Results: Out of 200 patients, 112(56%) were males, while 88(44%) were females. 193(96.5%) patients were pre-lingual under 12 years of age, while post-lingual patients were 7(3.5%) and were adults. Cochlear implants from Med-El 186(93%), Cochlear 2(1%) and Advance Bionic 1(0.5%) were implanted through a transmastoid, facial recess approach, while Neubio 11(5.5%) was implanted through a postauricular transcanal approach. Congenital deafness with consanguinity was the leading cause of deafness, while round window variation was the most frequently encountered surgical challenge.
Conclusion: In developing countries, financial restraints cause delays in surgery, leading to limited access to cochlear implant programmes. Surgical challenges are frequently encountered during surgery, and better understanding is required for easy implantation.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Cumpston E, Chen P. Implantable Hearing Devices. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
Clinkard D, Barbic S, Amoodi H, Shipp D, Lin V. The economic and societal benefits of adult cochlear implant implantation: A pilot exploratory study. Cochlear Implants Int 2015; 16(4): 181-185. http://doi.org/101179/1754762814Y0000000096.
Manrique Rodríguez M, Huarte Irujo A. Organisation of a Cochlear Implant Programme. Acta Otorrinolaringol 2013; 64(1): 55–67.
Dazert S, Thomas JP, Loth A, Zahnert T, Stöver T. Cochlear Implantation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117(41): 690-700.
http://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0690.
Entwisle LK, Warren SE, Messersmith JJ. Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss. Semin Hear 2018; 39(4): 390-404.
http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1670705.
Khan MIJ, Mukhtar N, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT. The Pakistan (Lahore) cochlear implant programme: Issues relating to implantation in a developing country. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121(8): 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215107007463.
Ahmed J, Saqulain G, Khan MIJ, Kausar M. Complications of Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Public Implant Centre Experience. Pakistan J Med Sci 2021; 37(5): 1519-1523.
https://doi.org/10.12669%2Fpjms.37.5.3960.
Leong AC, Jiang D, Agger A, Fitzgerald-O’Connor A. Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2012; 270(4): 1237–1242.
Human Rights Watch. World Report 2019: World Report. Human Rights Watch, 2019.
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Final Results (Census-2017). [Internet]. Available at:
https://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/final-results-census-2017. [Accessed on January 7, 2022]
Garrada M, Alsulami MK, Almutairi SN, Alessa SM, Alselami AF, Alharbi NA, et al. Cochlear Implant Complications in Children and Adults: Retrospective Analysis of 148 Cases. Cureus 2021; 13(12): e20750.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20750.
Freni F, Gazia F, Slavutsky V, Scherdel EP, Nicenboim L, Posada R, et al. Cochlear Implant Surgery: Endomeatal Approach versus Posterior Tympanotomy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(12): 4187. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124187.
Forli F, Lazzerini F, Montecchiari V, Morganti R, Bruschini L, Berrettini S. et al. Cochlear implant in prelingually hearing-impaired adults: prognostic factors and results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2021; 41(2): 173-179.
https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1146.
Rapport F, Hughes SE, Boisvert I, McMahon CM, Braithwaite J, Faris M, et al. Adults' cochlear implant journeys through care: aqualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20(1): 457. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05334-y.
Hashemi SB, Bozorgi H, Kazemi T, Babaei A. Cerebrospinal fluid gusher in cochlear implant and its associated factors. Acta Otolaryngol 2020; 140(8): 621-625.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2020.1751276.
Shafique S, Siddiqi S, Schraders M, Oostrik J, Ayub H, Bilal A, et al. Genetic spectrum of autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss in Pakistani families. PLoS One 2014; 9(6): e100146.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100146.
Korver AMH, Smith RJH, Van Camp G, Schleiss MR, Bitner-Glindzicz MAK, Lustig LR, et al. Congenital hearing loss. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3: 16094.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.94.
Lim XJ, Philip R, Teh HM, Raja FB, Tan JN. Analysis of paediatric cochlear implant candidacy: Single centre, retrospective observational study. Med J Malaysia 2022; 77(2): 143-149.
Stuermer K, Winter T, Nachtsheim L, Klussmann JP, Luers JC. Round window accessibility during cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278(2): 363-370.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
