Co-Loading Versus Pre-Loading for Preventing Post-Spinal Hypotension in Caesarean Section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i2.8150Keywords:
Co-loading, Leg Elevation, Post-Spinal Hypotension, Pre-loadingAbstract
Objective: To compare the frequency of post-spinal anaesthesia hypotension occurring with co-loading versus pre-loading in patients undergoing caesarean section.
Study Design: Cross-sectional analytical study.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesiology, Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, Sep 2020 to Mar 2021.
Methodology: A total of 70 patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section and meeting the sample selection criteria were included. Patients with emergency procedures or a history of blood pressure disorders were excluded. Patients in Group-A underwent co-loading with ringer lactate, while patients in Group-B underwent pre-loading. All participants had their systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure measured at the time of anaesthesia induction and then at 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes post anaesthesia induction.
Results: There was difference in mean systolic pressure at 10 and 15 minutes, p=0.001 and p=0.027, respectively. The difference in diastolic blood pressure was only significant at 10 minutes, p=0.001. While, mean arterial pressures were significantly higher at 10 and 15 minutes with co-loading, p<0.001 and p=0.019, respectively.
Conclusion: Co-loading is associated with less frequency of post-spinal hypotension than pre-loading and may be employed as a standard practice pre-operatively with spinal anaesthesia.
Downloads
References
Olawin AM, M Das J. Spinal Anesthesia. 2020. In: StatPearls.
Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
Ring L, Landau R, Delgado C. The Current Role of General
Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2021;
(1): 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6
Koo CH, Shin HJ, Han SH, Ryu JH. Lidocaine vs. Other Local
Anesthetics in the Development of Transient Neurologic
Symptoms (TNS) Following Spinal Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis
of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med 2020; 9(2): 493.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020493
Zhang N, He L, Ni JX. Level of sensory block after spinal
anesthesia as a predictor of hypotension in parturient. Medicine
; 96(25): e7184.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000007184
Ferré F, Martin C, Bosch L, Kurrek M, Lairez O, Minville V.
Control of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in adults. Local
Reg Anesth 2020; 13: 39-46. https://doi.org/10.2147/lra.s240753
Massoth C, Töpel L, Wenk M. Hypotension after spinal
anesthesia for cesarean section: how to approach the iatrogenic
sympathectomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33(3): 291-298.
https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0000000000000848
Alemayehu TY, Berhe YW, Getnet H, Molallign M.
Hemodynamic changes after spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic
patients undergoing cesarean section at a tertiary referral center
in Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 2020;
(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-020-00234-w
Bower JR, Kinsella SM. Preventing and treating hypotension
during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. BJA Educ 2020;
(11): 360-361. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.bjae.2020.08.001
Buthelezi AS, Bishop DG, Rodseth RN, Dyer RA. Prophylactic
phenylephrine and fluid co-administration to reduce spinal
hypotension during elective caesarean section in a
resource-limited setting: a prospective alternating intervention
study. Anaesthesia 2020; 75(4): 487-492.
https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14950
Rijs K, Mercier FJ, Lucas DN, Rossaint R, Klimek M, Heesen M.
Fluid loading therapy to prevent spinal hypotension in women
undergoing elective caesarean section: Network meta-analysis,
trial sequential analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Anaesthesiol
; 37(12): 1126-1142.
https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001371
Artawan IM, Sarim BY, Sagita S, Dedi MA. Comparison the Effect
of Preloading and Coloading with Crystalloid Fluid on the
Incidence of Hypotension after Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean
Section. Bali J Anaesthesiol 2020; 4(1): 3-7.
http://doi.org/10.4103/BJOA.BJOA_17_19
Kaufner L, Karekla A, Henkelmann A, Welfle S, von Weizsäcker
K, Hellmeyer L, et al. Crystalloid coloading vs. colloid coloading
in elective Caesarean section: postspinal hypotension and
vasopressor consumption, a prospective, observational clinical
trial. J Anesth 2019; 33(1): 40–49.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2581-x
Oh AY, Hwang JW, Song IA, Kim MH, Ryu JH, Park HP, et al.
Influence of the timing of administration of crystalloid on
maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean
delivery: preload versus coload. BMC Anesthesiol 2014: 14: 36.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-36
Jacob JJ, Williams A, Verghese M, Afzal L. Crystalloid preload
versus crystalloid coload for parturients undergoing cesarean
section under spinal anesthesia. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2012;
(1): 10-15.
Rehmani SJ, Sharif A, Gulrez A. Prevention of hypotension after
spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean sections. Pak Armed
Forces Med J 2020; 70(4): 1034-1038.
Khan MU, Memon AS, Ishaq M, Aqil M. Preload Versus Coload
and Vasopressor Requirement for the Prevention of Spinal
Anesthesia Induced Hypotension in Non-Obstetric Patients. J
Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015; 25(12): 851-855.
Reshan RG. Preloading versus coloading of crystalloid fluid to
control hypotension due to spinal anesthesia. Int J Adv Res 2018;
(1): 585-588. http://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6259
Teoh WH, Sia AT. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal
anesthesia for cesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac
output. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(5): 1592-1598.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819e016d
Varshney R, Jain G. Comparison of colloid preload versus coload
under low dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth
Essays Res 2013; 7(3): 376-380.