Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Zeeshan Shoukat Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Saeed Awan Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Bahawalpur/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Talha Makshoof Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Mujahid Zulfiqar Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Sohail Ilyas Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Zubair Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Abbottabd/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i2.7823

Keywords:

Four port laparoscopy, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Three port laparoscopy

Abstract

Objective: To compare the complications among patients undergoing three-port versus four-port laparoscopic
cholecystectomy at our tertiary care hospital.

Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta Pakistan, from Feb to Oct 2021.

Methodology: Study was conducted on 200 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for any benign gall bladder pathology during the study period. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group-A underwent a three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, while Group-B underwent a four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Post-operative pain, surgical site infection, duration of hospital stay, and conversion to open method were compared in both groups.

Results: Out of 100 patients included in the final analysis, 33 were male, and 67 were female. The mean age of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for benign gall bladder pathologies in our study was 42.95±9.47 years. 43(43%) underwent three ports, while 57(57%) underwent four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Duration of hospital stay was statistically significantly less in patients with three-port laparoscopic surgery than in patients undergoing four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p-value<0.05).
Conclusion: Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy emerged as a better option than conventional four-port cholecystectomy in our study population in terms of the shorter duration of hospital stay. All other complications were not significantly different in both groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Vitale A, Lai Q. New trends and perspectives in hepatobiliary

surgery: preface. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3: 99.

https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2018.11.06

Artifon EL, Loureiro JF, Baron TH, Fernandes K, Kahaleh M,

Marson FP, et al. Surgery or EUS-guided

choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary

obstruction after ERCP failure. Endosc Ultrasound 2015; 4(3):

-243. https://doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.163010.

Hong KS, Noh KT, Min SK, Lee HK. Selection of surgical

treatment types for intrahepatic duct stones. Korean J

Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2011; 15(3): 139-145.

https://doi.org/10.14701%2Fkjhbps.2011.15.3.139.

Haribhakti SP, Mistry JH. Techniques of laparoscopic

cholecystectomy: Nomenclature and selection. J Minim Access

Surg 2015; 11(2): 113-118.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.140220.

Casaccia M, Palombo D, Razzore A, Firpo E, Gallo F, Fornaro R.

Laparoscopic Single-Port Versus Traditional Multi-Port

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Soc Lap Surg 2019; 23(3):

e2018.00102.

https://doi.org/10.4293%2FJSLS.2018.00102

Singal R, Sharma A, Zaman M. The Safety and Efficacy of

Clipless versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy -

our Experience in an Indian Rural Center. Maedica 2018; 13(1):

-43.

Hajong R, Khariong PD. A comparative study of two-port

versus three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access

Surg 2016; 12(4): 311-314.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181309.

Ciftci A, Yazicioglu MB, Tiryaki C, Turgut HT, Subasi O, Ilgoz

M, et al. Is the fourth port routinely required for laparoscopic

cholecystectomy? Our three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

experience. Ir J Med Sci 2016; 185(4): 909-912.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1493-8

Besler E, Koksal HM, Uludag M. A comparison study of lefthand three-port videoscopy, left-hand four-port videoscopy and

standard four-port videoscopy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Ann Ital Chir 2019; 90: 341-349.

Tariq M, Hafeez M, Fatima F, Khalid U, Ateeque S, Zainab A, et

al. Three port vs four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy a twoyear experience at two armed forces tertiary care hospitals. Pak

Armed Forces Med J 2020; 70 (2): 402-408.

Farooq U, Rashid T, Naheed A, Barkat N, Iqbal M, Sultana Q, et

al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An

experience of 247 cases. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2015;

(2): 407-410.

Trichak S. Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic

cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(9): 1434-1436.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8713-1.

Azawi DA, Houssein N, Rayis AB, McMahon D, Hehir DJ.

Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in

acute and chronic cholecystitis. BMC Surg 2007; 7: 1–6

Hassan RSEE, Osman SOS, Aabdeen MAS, Mohamed WEA,

Hassan RSEE, Mohamed SOO, et al. Incidence and root causes of

surgical site infections after gastrointestinal surgery at a public

teaching hospital in Sudan.Patient Saf Surg 2020; 14(1): 45.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-020-00272-4

Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, Peeters A. Single-incision

laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port

laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2017; 31(9): 3437-3448.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5381-0.

Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK. Three-port versus standard

four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized

controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital

in eastern Nepal. J Soc Lap Surg 2007; 11(3): 358-362.

Hajong R, Hajong D, Natung T, Anand M, Sharma G. A

Comparative Study of Single Incision versus Conventional Four

Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;

(10): PC06-PC09.

https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/19982.8601.

Hajibandeh S, Finch DA, Mohamedahmed AYY, Iskandar A,

Venkatesan G, Hajibandeh S, et al. Meta-analysis and trial

sequential analysis of three-port vs four-port laparoscopic

cholecystectomy (level 1 evidence). Updates Surg 2021; 73(2):

-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-00982-z

Downloads

Published

29-04-2024

How to Cite

1.
Shoukat Z, Muhammad Saeed Awan, Talha Makshoof, Mujahid Zulfiqar, Sohail Ilyas, Muhammad Zubair. Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2024 Apr. 29 [cited 2024 May 24];74(2):372-5. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/7823

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)