COMPARISON OF CIRCUMCISION BY PLASTIBELL VERSUS OPEN METHOD

Circumcision by Plastibell Vs Open Method

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study is to compare circumcision by plastibell and open method in terms of bleeding, infection and cosmesis.
Study Design: Randomized clinical trial.
Place and Duration of Study: Surgical ward, Combined Military Hospital, Kharian from Aug 2011 to Sep 2012.
Material and Methods: All individuals fulfilling inclusion criteria underwent circumcision in the operation theatre of CMH Kharian as indoor patients, under local anaesthesia and aseptic measures. In group 1, circumcision was done using plastibell where as in group 2, circumcision was done by open method.
Results: Mean age in plastibell group was 3.37 months (SD=1.77) and in open group was 3.12 months (SD=1.33) (p=0.100). In plastibell group 18% had bleeding however in open group 4% had bleeding (p<0.001). In plastibell group 4% patients had infection. However in open group 15% had infection (p<0.001). In plastibell group 82% parents were satisfied whereas 18% had extra skin, whereas in open group 96% parents were satisfied, 1% had extra skin and 3% had less skin (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Circumcision being a commonest surgical procedure demands careful selection of the operative procedure because plastibell method is superior in terms of post-operative infection whereas open method is better in terms of cosmesis and post-operative bleeding.