Comparison of Marginal Integrity of Class-1 Restorations With Spectrum Tph-3 Versus Nexcomp In Mandibular Molars - A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i5.6831Keywords:
Composite Resins, Dental Restoration, Dental Restoration Failure.Abstract
Objective: To compare the marginal integrity of Class-1 restorations with Spectrum TPH-3 vs Nexcomp in mandibular molars.
Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.
Place and Duration of Study: Operative Dentistry Department of Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry (AFID), Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Sep 2020 to May 2021.
Methodology: A total of 60 candidates were enrolled and allocated randomly to one of two groups, A and B. Group-A received spectrum TPH3 and Group-B received Nexcomp composite. Patients were followed up after 2 and 6 months for evaluation of marginal fractures with the help of loupes, probes, mouth mirrors and bitewing radiographs.
Result: The rate of marginal fractures in Nexcomp were greater (27% at 2 months and 30% at 6 months) as compared to Spectrum TPH3 (73% at 2 months and at 77% 6 months) yielding a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p value= 0.004 and 0.001).
Conclusion: Spectrum TPH gives a better quality of posterior restoration as compared to Nexcomp, contributing positively towards better quality of oral health for patient.
Downloads
References
Nour Eldeen HM, Noaman K, Wakwak MA. Nanoleakage evaluation of nano-filled resin composite using different adhesive systems at different dentin depth. Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 2021; 24(1): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2020.38577.1091
De Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Medeiros e Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Monteiro GQ, Montes MA. Resin composite Class I restorations: a 54-month randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2014; 39(6): 588–594.
Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23(1): 51-59.
Alzraikat H, Burrow M, Maghaireh G, Taha N. Nanofilled resin composite properties and clinical performance: a review. Oper Dent 2018; 43(4): E173-E190. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-208-t
Jandt K, Watts D. Nanotechnology in dentistry: present and future perspectives on dental nanomaterials. Dent Mater 2020; 36(11): 1365-1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.006
De Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Guedes Lima SJ, Passos TA, Lima KC, Montes MA. Nanohybrid versus nanofill composite in class I cavities: margin analysis after 12 months. Microsc Res Tech 2011; 74(1): 23-27.
Enone LL, Awotile AO, Adegbulugbe CI, Agbaje LO, Odogun LA, Oyapero A. Comparison of the clinical performance of a nanohybrid and a microhybrid resin composite in the restoration of posterior teeth in Nigerians. Odontostomatol Trop 2017; 7(3): 130-136.
Maran BM, De Geus JL, Gutiérrez MF, Heintze S, Tardem C, Barceleiro MO, et al. Nanofilled/nanohybrid and hybrid resin-based composite in patients with direct restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2020; 99: 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103407
Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP, Busato AL. 3-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33(2): 144-151.
Soares CJ, Faria-E-Silva AL, Rodrigues M, Fernandes Vilela AB, Pfeifer CS, Tantbirojn D, et al. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements - What do we need to know? Braz Oral Res 2017; 31(8): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0081
Zhou W, Liu S, Zhou X, Hannig M, Rupf S, Feng J, et al. Modifying adhesive materials to improve the longevity of resinous restorations. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20(3): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030572
Al-Zain AO, Eckert GJ, Lukic H, Megremis S, Platt JA. Polymerization pattern characterization within a resin-based composite cured using different curing units at two distances. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23(11): 3995–4010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02882-w
Suda S, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Nojiri K, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T, et al. Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives: effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching. Dent Mater J 2018; 37(2): 244–255. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-120
Alencar MF, Pereira MT, De-Moraes MDR, Santiago SL, Passos VF. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic acids on nanofilled and bulk fill resin composites: roughness, surface hardness, and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Microsc Res Tech 2020; 83(2): 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23376
Ali RH, Niazy MA, Naguib EA, Abdel Ghany OS. Effect of application technique and mode of curing on nanoleakage of universal adhesive system. Futur Dent J 2018; 4(2): 253–261.
Van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: a 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent 2016; 51: 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.008
Chandrasekhar V, Rudrapati L, Badami V, Tummala M. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20(6): 386-391. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_189_17
Mahajan V, Bhondwe S, Doot R, Balpande R, Bhandari S, Dahiwale S. Failures in composite restoration. Int J Dent Res 2015; 3(2): 10. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijdr.v3i2.4442
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nasir Jamal Baig, Fahmeed Akhtar, Muzzamil Jamil Ahmad Rana, Mafaza Alam, Mehmood Ahmad Rana, Mehvish Abbas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
