Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth Measured by IOLMaster and A-Scan Ultrasonography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72iSUPPL-2.3894Keywords:
Anterior Chamber, Interferometry, Reproducibility, Color Doppler ultrasonographyAbstract
Objective: To compare anterior chamber depth measurements by ultrasound A-scan and IOLMaster, and evaluate interdevice agreement and
interchangeability.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted on subjects attending preoperative cataract surgery clinic at Armed Forces Institute of
Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Nov 2018 and Jan 2019.
Methodology: Eighty subjects between 15 to 80 years of age were enrolled in the study. Biometric measurements of all subjects were carried
out by a single investigator. The values obtained were compared using paired t-test, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Sixty-two men and eighteen women were examined. Mean age was 61.3 ± 11.8 years. Mean anterior chamber depth was 3.25 ± 0.42
mm with A-scan and 3.25 ± 0.47 mm with IOLMaster. Mean difference was 0.007 ± 0.32 mm which was not statistically significant (p=0.852).
The values were significantly correlated (r=0.749, p<0.001) and had no significant proportional bias (p=0.138). There was good agreement
between the two devices for anterior chamber depth measurement. Anterior chamber depth was found to be positively correlated with axial
length, negatively correlated with age and not correlated with intraocular pressure.
Conclusion: Ultrasound A-scan and IOLMaster have good agreement in measuring anterior chamber depth. Any difference between them is
not statistically significant and is unlikely to be clinically important.
Downloads
References
Fernández-Vigo JI, Fernández-Vigo JÁ, Macarro-Merino A, FernándezPérez C, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, García-Feijoó J. Determinants of
anterior chamber depth in a large Caucasian population and agreement
between intra-ocular lens Master and Pentacam measurements of this
variable. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94(2): e150-5. doi: 10.1111/aos.12824.
Ning X, Yang Y, Yan H, Zhang J. Anterior chamber depth - a predictor
of refractive outcomes after age-related cataract surgery. BMC
Ophthalmol 2019; 19(1): 134.
Jeong J, Song H, Lee JK, Chuck RS, Kwon JW. The effect of ocular
biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation
formulas. BMC Ophthalmol 2017; 17(1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-
-y.
Avdagic E, Lazzaro DR. Evaluation of the Effect of Cycloplegia on
Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Optical LowCoherence Reflectometry. Eye Contact Lens 2018; 44 Suppl 1: S59-S61.
doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000322.
Nanu RV, Ungureanu E, Istrate SL, Vrapciu A, Cozubas R, Carstocea L
et al. Investigation of importance of the structural parameters of the
eyeball and of the technical parameters of cataract surgery on corneal
endothelial changes. Rom J Ophthalmol 2018; 62(3): 203-211.
Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Erdenbeleig
T, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for
primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch
Ophthalmol 2000; 118(2): 257-63.
Li X, Wang W, Huang W, Chen S, Wang J, Wang Z et al. Difference of
uveal parameters between the acute primary angle closure eyes and the
fellow eyes. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32(7): 1174-1182. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-
-9.
Barrett BT, McGraw PV. Clinical assessment of anterior chamber depth.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; Suppl 2: S32-9.
Dong J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Jia Z, Zhang S, Wang X. Comparison of axial
length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between
IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes. PLoS One
; 13(3): e0194273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194273.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison
studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–60.
Shen P, Zheng Y, Ding X, Liu B, Congdon N, Morgan I, et al. Biometric
measurements in highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39(2):
-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.064.
Németh J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound
measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular
lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29(1): 85-8.
Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Avni I, Zadok D. Comparison of different
techniques of anterior chamber depth and kerato-metric measurements.
Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143(1): 48-53.
Lam AK, Chan R, Pang PC. The repeatability and accuracy of axial
length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21(6): 477-83.
Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Fotouhi A. Anterior chamber
depth measurement with a-scan ultrasonography, Orbscan II, and
IOLMaster. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82(10): 900-4.
Bai QH, Wang JL, Wang QQ, Yan QC, Zhang JS. The measurement of
anterior chamber depth and axial length with the IOLMaster compared
with contact ultrasonic axial scan. Int J Ophthalmol 2008; 1(2): 151–4.
Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, et al. Influence
of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry
compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract
Surg 2003; 29(10): 1950-5.
Kaygisiz M, Elgin U, Tekin K, Sen E, Yilmazbas P. Comparison of anterior segment parameters in patients with pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma,
patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome, and normal subjects. Arq
Bras Oftalmol 2018; 81(2): 110-115. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20180025.
Elgin U, Şen E, Uzel M, Yılmazbaş P. Comparison of Refractive Status
and Anterior Segment Parameters of Juvenile Open-Angle Glaucoma
and Normal Subjects. Turk J Ophthalmol 2018; 48(6): 295-298. doi:
4274/tjo.68915.
Adewara BA, Adegbehingbe BO, Onakpoya OH, Ihemedu CG.
Relationship between intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth and
lens thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Int Ophthalmol
; 38(2): 541-547. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0488-4.
Wang S, Zhuang W, Ma J, Xu M, Piao S, Hao J, et al. Association of
Genes implicated in primary angle-closure Glaucoma and the ocular
biometric parameters of anterior chamber depth and axial length in a
northern Chinese population. BMC Ophthalmol 2018; 18(1): 271. doi:
1186/s12886-018-0934-8.
Momeni-Moghaddam H, Maddah N, Wolffsohn JS, Etezad-Razavi
M, Zarei Ghanavati S, Akhavan Rezayat A, et al. The Effect of
Cycloplegia on the Ocular Biometric and Anterior Segment Parameters:
A Cross-Sectional Study. Ophthalmol Ther 2019; 8(3): 387-395. doi:
1007/s40123-019-0187-5.
Özyol P, Özyol E, Baldemir E. Changes in Ocular Parameters and
Intraocular Lens Powers in Aging Cycloplegic Eyes. Am J Ophthalmol
; 173: 76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.032