Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth Measured by IOLMaster and A-Scan Ultrasonography

Authors

  • Shafaq Rabbani Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Amjad Akram Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Amer Yaqub The Eye Consultants, Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Ammara Ashraf Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Fatima Khan Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72iSUPPL-2.3894

Keywords:

Anterior Chamber, Interferometry, Reproducibility, Color Doppler ultrasonography

Abstract

Objective: To compare anterior chamber depth measurements by ultrasound A-scan and IOLMaster, and evaluate interdevice agreement and
interchangeability.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted on subjects attending preoperative cataract surgery clinic at Armed Forces Institute of
Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Nov 2018 and Jan 2019.
Methodology: Eighty subjects between 15 to 80 years of age were enrolled in the study. Biometric measurements of all subjects were carried
out by a single investigator. The values obtained were compared using paired t-test, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Sixty-two men and eighteen women were examined. Mean age was 61.3 ± 11.8 years. Mean anterior chamber depth was 3.25 ± 0.42
mm with A-scan and 3.25 ± 0.47 mm with IOLMaster. Mean difference was 0.007 ± 0.32 mm which was not statistically significant (p=0.852).
The values were significantly correlated (r=0.749, p<0.001) and had no significant proportional bias (p=0.138). There was good agreement
between the two devices for anterior chamber depth measurement. Anterior chamber depth was found to be positively correlated with axial
length, negatively correlated with age and not correlated with intraocular pressure.
Conclusion: Ultrasound A-scan and IOLMaster have good agreement in measuring anterior chamber depth. Any difference between them is
not statistically significant and is unlikely to be clinically important.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fernández-Vigo JI, Fernández-Vigo JÁ, Macarro-Merino A, FernándezPérez C, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, García-Feijoó J. Determinants of

anterior chamber depth in a large Caucasian population and agreement

between intra-ocular lens Master and Pentacam measurements of this

variable. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94(2): e150-5. doi: 10.1111/aos.12824.

Ning X, Yang Y, Yan H, Zhang J. Anterior chamber depth - a predictor

of refractive outcomes after age-related cataract surgery. BMC

Ophthalmol 2019; 19(1): 134.

Jeong J, Song H, Lee JK, Chuck RS, Kwon JW. The effect of ocular

biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation

formulas. BMC Ophthalmol 2017; 17(1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-

-y.

Avdagic E, Lazzaro DR. Evaluation of the Effect of Cycloplegia on

Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Optical LowCoherence Reflectometry. Eye Contact Lens 2018; 44 Suppl 1: S59-S61.

doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000322.

Nanu RV, Ungureanu E, Istrate SL, Vrapciu A, Cozubas R, Carstocea L

et al. Investigation of importance of the structural parameters of the

eyeball and of the technical parameters of cataract surgery on corneal

endothelial changes. Rom J Ophthalmol 2018; 62(3): 203-211.

Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Erdenbeleig

T, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for

primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch

Ophthalmol 2000; 118(2): 257-63.

Li X, Wang W, Huang W, Chen S, Wang J, Wang Z et al. Difference of

uveal parameters between the acute primary angle closure eyes and the

fellow eyes. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32(7): 1174-1182. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-

-9.

Barrett BT, McGraw PV. Clinical assessment of anterior chamber depth.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; Suppl 2: S32-9.

Dong J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Jia Z, Zhang S, Wang X. Comparison of axial

length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between

IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes. PLoS One

; 13(3): e0194273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194273.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison

studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–60.

Shen P, Zheng Y, Ding X, Liu B, Congdon N, Morgan I, et al. Biometric

measurements in highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39(2):

-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.064.

Németh J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound

measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular

lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29(1): 85-8.

Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Avni I, Zadok D. Comparison of different

techniques of anterior chamber depth and kerato-metric measurements.

Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143(1): 48-53.

Lam AK, Chan R, Pang PC. The repeatability and accuracy of axial

length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21(6): 477-83.

Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Fotouhi A. Anterior chamber

depth measurement with a-scan ultrasonography, Orbscan II, and

IOLMaster. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82(10): 900-4.

Bai QH, Wang JL, Wang QQ, Yan QC, Zhang JS. The measurement of

anterior chamber depth and axial length with the IOLMaster compared

with contact ultrasonic axial scan. Int J Ophthalmol 2008; 1(2): 151–4.

Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, et al. Influence

of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry

compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract

Surg 2003; 29(10): 1950-5.

Kaygisiz M, Elgin U, Tekin K, Sen E, Yilmazbas P. Comparison of anterior segment parameters in patients with pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma,

patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome, and normal subjects. Arq

Bras Oftalmol 2018; 81(2): 110-115. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20180025.

Elgin U, Şen E, Uzel M, Yılmazbaş P. Comparison of Refractive Status

and Anterior Segment Parameters of Juvenile Open-Angle Glaucoma

and Normal Subjects. Turk J Ophthalmol 2018; 48(6): 295-298. doi:

4274/tjo.68915.

Adewara BA, Adegbehingbe BO, Onakpoya OH, Ihemedu CG.

Relationship between intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth and

lens thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Int Ophthalmol

; 38(2): 541-547. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0488-4.

Wang S, Zhuang W, Ma J, Xu M, Piao S, Hao J, et al. Association of

Genes implicated in primary angle-closure Glaucoma and the ocular

biometric parameters of anterior chamber depth and axial length in a

northern Chinese population. BMC Ophthalmol 2018; 18(1): 271. doi:

1186/s12886-018-0934-8.

Momeni-Moghaddam H, Maddah N, Wolffsohn JS, Etezad-Razavi

M, Zarei Ghanavati S, Akhavan Rezayat A, et al. The Effect of

Cycloplegia on the Ocular Biometric and Anterior Segment Parameters:

A Cross-Sectional Study. Ophthalmol Ther 2019; 8(3): 387-395. doi:

1007/s40123-019-0187-5.

Özyol P, Özyol E, Baldemir E. Changes in Ocular Parameters and

Intraocular Lens Powers in Aging Cycloplegic Eyes. Am J Ophthalmol

; 173: 76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.032

Downloads

Published

06-06-2022

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Rabbani S, Akram A, Yaqub A, Ashraf A, Khan F. Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth Measured by IOLMaster and A-Scan Ultrasonography. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 6 [cited 2024 Sep. 21];72(SUPPL-2):S293-296. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/3894