COMPARISON OF AMIODARONE VS MAGNESIUM SULPHATE IN THE PREVENTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation

Authors

  • Dr Imran Bashir . AFID/NIHD Rawalpindi.
  • Safdar Abbas . Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology / National Institute of Heart Diseases, Rawalpindi

Keywords:

Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Amiodarone, Magnesium Sulphate

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and can result in increased morbidity and mortality, increased length of hospital stay, and increased cost. In this study we compared the efficacy of amiodarone versus magnesium sulphate in the prophylaxis of post-CABG atrial fibrillation.
Objective: This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of amiodarone in comparison to magnesium sulphate in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trials.
Place and duration of study: The study was carried out at Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology and National Institute of Heart Diseases, Rawalpindi from July 2010 to December 2011
Patients and Methods: Total 240 patients were included in the study and randomly divided in two groups of 120 each using random number table. Patients in Group A (Amiodarone group) were given a loading dose of amiodarone 5 mg/Kg after induction of anesthesia which was then continued as infusion at 5 μgm/Kg/minute on first postoperative day. This was followed by an oral dose of 600 mg/day postoperatively for 5 days. Those in Group B (Magnesium Sulphate group) received 2 g of magnesium sulphate in 100 ml of isotonic 0.9% solution intravenously over 1 hour at following times: preoperatively, immediately following the operation, and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3.
Results: Thirteen patients (10.8%) developed AF in Amiodarone group, compared to 31 patients (25.8%) in magnesium sulphate group. The results proved amiodarone to be more effective than magnesium sulphate in preventing post-CABG AF (p<0.001). Thirty one patients who developed AF postoperatively in the magnesium group were treated with amiodarone, and all patients recovered normal sinus rhythm. In the amiodarone prophylaxis group, 9 patients regained sinus rhythm in 6 – 8 hours, while for 4 remaining patients cardioversion was attempted out of which 2 responded.
Conclusion: Prophylactic use of amiodarone is significantly better in preventing post-CABG AF in comparison to magnesium sulphate and its use is recommended as prophylactic treatment for post-CABG AF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2013

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
. DIB, . SA. COMPARISON OF AMIODARONE VS MAGNESIUM SULPHATE IN THE PREVENTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY: Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2013 Mar. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 18];63(1):127-32. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/2189