VALIDITY OF LUNG PERFUSION SPECT SCAN MATCHED WITH A CHEST RADIOGRAPH IN ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM

Authors

  • Mehdi Raza Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Rawalpindi
  • Mujahid Khalid Ali Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Rawalpindi

Keywords:

Computed tomography, Multidetector, Pulmonary embolism, Sensitivity and specificity, SPECT, Validity

Abstract

Objective: To validate single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) lung perfusion scan (LPS) matched with a recent chest radiograph against computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) used as gold standard, for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
Study Design: Validation study.
Place and Duration of Study: Nuclear Medical Centre, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from 31th May 2011 to 7th December 2012.
Patients and Methods: Thirty patients suspected of acute PE with Wells’ score ≥ 2, representing intermediate and high PE probability were enrolled, through non-probability, consecutive sampling. LPS scans, acquired after intravenous injection of 175-200 MBq of Tc-99 m macro albumin aggregates, were matched with chest radiographs (instead of ventilation scans) and reported as positive or negative for acute PE. Outcomes were compared against CTPA results, and diagnostic measures were calculated.
Results: LPS scan (matched with chest radiograph) was found to have sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.33%, each Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (k) was0.866.
Conclusion: Lung perfusion SPECT scan matched with a recent chest radiograph is a reliable investigation for the diagnosis of acute PE and can suffice as a stand-alone test to guide patient management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2013

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Raza M, Ali MK. VALIDITY OF LUNG PERFUSION SPECT SCAN MATCHED WITH A CHEST RADIOGRAPH IN ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2013 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];63(4):534-38. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/2159