A Participatory Approach to Develop Ethical Guidelines for Generative Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i5.13606Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Ethical Guidelines, Supervisors' Perceptions, Students' PerceptionsAbstract
Objective: To explore the perceptions of supervisors and postgraduate students on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in thesis writing.
Study Design: Qualitative Exploratory Study.
Place and Duration of Study: Riphah International University Rawalpindi, Pakistan from Jan to Jun 2024.
Methodology: Focus group discussions were employed to gather data from 20 participants, consisting of university supervisors and postgraduate students. Thematic analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti 9 to identify recurring themes related to the ethical use of AI in thesis writing.
Results: Five key themes emerged from the analysis: transparency, academic integrity, personal development, data privacy, and supervision. Both students and supervisors expressed concerns about the ethical use of AI, particularly around issues like plagiarism, over-reliance, and data security. Supervisors also emphasized the need for institutional policies to regulate AI usage, while students perceived AI as a tool for enhancing their academic skills.
Conclusion: There is a critical need for comprehensive ethical guidelines to govern the use of AI in academic research, particularly in thesis writing. Engagement of key stakeholder including academic supervisors, students, and institutional authorities in the formulation of these guidelines provided a balanced approach in identifying the benefits of AI while addressing concerns related to academic integrity, transparency, and data privacy.
Downloads
References
1. Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell 2023;6(1):1169595.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1169595
2. Karpov OE, Pitsik EN, Kurkin SA, Maksimenko VA, Gusev AV, Shusharina NN, et al. Analysis of publication activity and research trends in the field of ai medical applications: Network approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023;20(7):5335.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075335
3. Rajpurkar P, Chen E, Banerjee O, Topol EJ. AI in health and medicine. Nat Med 2022;28(1):31-38.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0
4. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authorship and AI tools [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-Ai-tools
5. Ahaley SS, Pandey A, Juneja SK, Gupta TS, Vijayakumar S. ChatGPT in medical writing: A game-changer or a gimmick? Perspect Clin Res 2024;15(4):165-171.
https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_167_23
6. Armitage R. Generative AI in medical writing: co-author or tool? Br J Gen Pract 2024;74(740):126-127.
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp24x736605
7. Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, Chatila R, Chazerand P, Dignum V, et al. AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds Mach 2018;28(4):689-707.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
8. Hosseini M, Rasmussen LM, Resnik DB. Using AI to write scholarly publications. Account Res 2024;31(7):715-723.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
9. Bergquist M, Rolandsson B, Gryska E, Laesser M, Hoefling N, Heckemann R. Trust and stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of AI tools in clinical radiology. Eur Radiol 2024;34(1):338-347.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09967-5
10. Preiksaitis C, Rose C. Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Scoping Review. JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e48785.
11. Kazley AS, Andresen C, Mund A, Blankenship C, Segal R. Is use of ChatGPT cheating? Students of health professions perceptions. Med Teach 2025;47(5):894-898.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2024.2385667
12. Cervantes J, Smith B, Ramadoss T, D'Amario V, Shoja MM, Rajput V. Decoding medical educators' perceptions on generative artificial intelligence in medical education. J Investig Med 2024;72(7):633-639.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589241257215
13. Klimova B, Pikhart M. Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence on student and academic well-being in higher education: a mini-review. Front Psychol 2025;16:1498132.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498132
14. McEachan JE, Lam WL. Response to concerns about the increasing influence of artificial intelligence in publishing. J Hand Surg Eur 2023;48(8):697-698.
https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934231183224
15. Guleria A, Krishan K, Sharma V, Kanchan T. ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research. J Infect Dev Ctries 2023;17(9):1292-1299. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18738
16. Chen Y, Esmaeilzadeh P. Generative AI in Medical Practice: In-Depth Exploration of Privacy and Security Challenges. J Med Internet Res 2024;26(1):e53008.
https://doi.org/10.2196/53008.
17. Zhang J, Zhang ZM. Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023;23(1):7.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9
18. Chen M, Decary M. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: An essential guide for health leaders. Healthc Manage Forum 2020;33(1):10-18.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419873123
19. Liyanage H, Liaw ST, Jonnagaddala J, Schreiber R, Kuziemsky C, Terry AL, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Primary Health Care: Perceptions, Issues, and Challenges. Yearb Med Inform 2019;28(1):41-46.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677901
20. Ashraf MA, Alam J, Kalim U. Effects of ChatGPT on students’ academic performance in Pakistan higher education classrooms. Sci Rep 2025;15(1):16434.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fatima Shaukat, Zainab Kamal, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Madiha Sajjad, Irum Tassaduq, Salma Ambreen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
