Comparison of Single Muscle Supra Maximal Lateral Rectus Recession  with Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Surgery For Mild  to Moderate Degree Exotropia

Authors

  • Kashif Ali Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Saad Mushtaq Malik Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Khizar Niazi Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Farooq Ahmad Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Haseeb Ahmed Khan Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Ifrah Idrees Lodhi Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75iSUPPL-7.12700

Keywords:

Bilateral, exotropia, lateral rectus, mild, moderate, recession surgery, supra maximal, unilateral

Abstract

Objective: To compare unilateral supra maximal lateral rectus recession (ULR) and bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR) surgery in terms of efficacy and success rate in cases of mild to moderate degree exotropia.

Study Design: Quasi experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Multan, Pakistan from Feb 2023 to Jan 2024.

Methodology:  60 patients having exotropia in the prism diopters (PD) range of 10–30 were included in the study. Randomized sampling was done, and the patients were divided into 2 groups. 30 patients with exotropia underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession surgery (Group-A) whereas other 30 patients underwent bilateral lateral rectus recession surgery (Group-B).

Results: After one week of surgery, the angle of deviation in PD was seen to be 3.33±4.17 PD in Group-A and 2.8±4.12 PD in Group-B (p= 0.801). Following each surgical procedure, there was a significant improvement in the angle of strabismus (p<0.05). At final evaluation (3 months after surgery) exotropia improved on average by 15.66±6.28 PD in Group-A & 16.86 ± 4.66 PD in Group-B (p <0.05)

Conclusion: Success rate range was high and comparable in both the groups. When correcting mild to moderate angle exotropia (≤30 PD), unilateral supra maximal lateral rectus recession is more beneficial than bilateral lateral recession because of reduced anaesthesia time, reduced surgical risks such as scleral perforation, retinal detachment and endophthalmitis. Furthermore, the rate of consecutive esotropia and over-correction is decreased. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Saad Mushtaq Malik, Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan /National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

    Lt Col Saad Mushtaq Malik, Consultant Eye Specialist, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, CMH Multan

References

1. Buck D, Powell CJ, Rahi J, Cumberland P, Tiffin P, Taylor R, et al. The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort. BMC Ophthalmol 2012; 12: 1-7.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-1

2. Jang YK, Bae SH, Choi DG. Surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession versus recess-resect in children with convergence insufficiency type intermittent exotropia. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 8591.

https://doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12664-w

3. Rehman HU, Ahmad A, Ullah W, Ullah H. Comparison of bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral recession/resection for basic type intermittent exotropia. BMC J Med Sci 2024; 5(1): 43–47. https://doi.org/10.70905/bmcj.05.01.0266

4. Li JH, Zhang LJ. Three-muscle surgery for very large-angle constant exotropia. J AAPOS 2013; 17(6): 578-581.

https://doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.07.015

5. Kaur K, Gurnani B. Exotropia In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK578185/

6. Yang X, Man TT, Tian QX, Zhao GQ, Kong QL, Meng Y, et al. Long-term postoperative outcomes of bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral recession-resection for intermittent exotropia. Int J Ophthalmol 2014; 7(6): 1043.

https://doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.25

7. Bae GH, Bae SH, Choi DG. Surgical outcomes of intermittent exotropia according to exotropia type based on distance/near differences. PLoS One 2019; 14(3): e0214478.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214478

8. Choi DD, Noh H, Park KA, Oh SY. Survival analysis of adult and children intermittent exotropia using a matched case-control design. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1): 575.

https://doi:10.1038/s41598-018-38160-8

9. Gurland J, Vagge A, Nelson LB. One-muscle strabismus surgery: a review. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2018; 55(5): 288-292.https://doi:10.3928/01913913-20180327-03

10. Wang Z, Li T, Zuo X, Liu L, Zhang T, Leng Z, et al. Preoperative and postoperative clinical factors in predicting the early recurrence risk of intermittent exotropia after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2023; 251: 115-125.

https://doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2023.02.024

11. Lee HJ, Kim SJ. Long-term outcomes following resection-recession versus plication-recession in children with intermittent exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 2020; 104(3): 350-356.

https://doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313711

12. Kim JA, Yu YS, Kim SJ. Factors associated with the prognosis after operation in children with recurrent intermittent exotropia. J Korean Med Sci 2019; 34(38).

https://doi:10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e252

13. Spierer O, Spierer A. Unilateral lateral rectus recession is an effective surgery for intermittent exotropia in young children. BMC Ophthalmol 2021; 21: 1-4.

https://doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01778-2

14. Joo HJ, Choi JJ, Ro JW, Choi DG. Comparison of sensory outcomes in patients with successful motor outcome versus recurrent exotropia after surgery for intermittent exotropia. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 13195. https://doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17067-5

15. Donahue SP, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Arthur BW, Paysse EA, Wallace DK, et al. A randomized trial comparing bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recess and resect for basic-type intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmol 2019; 126(2): 305-317. https://doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.041

16. Nelson LB, Bacal DA, Burke MJ. An alternative approach to the surgical management of exotropia - the unilateral lateral rectus recession. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2013;29(6):357–360. https://doi.org/10.3928/0191-3913-19921101-06

17. Dadeya S, Kamlesh. Long-term results of unilateral lateral rectus recession in intermittent exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2013;40(5):283–287.

https://doi:10.3928/0191-3913-20030901-09

18. Al-Haddad C, Ismail K, Houry R, Al Sayyid S, El Moussawi Z. Recurrence of intermittent exotropia after bilateral lateral rectus recession. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2020; 27(2): 123-127.

https://doi:10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_188_18

Downloads

Published

29-11-2025

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Ali K, Malik SM, Niazi MK, Ahmad F, Khan HA, Lodhi II. Comparison of Single Muscle Supra Maximal Lateral Rectus Recession  with Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Surgery For Mild  to Moderate Degree Exotropia. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 29 [cited 2025 Dec. 6];75(SUPPL-7):S1083-S1087. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/12700