Effect of Artificial Pneumothorax on Operating Time for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic   (VATS) Thymectomy

Authors

  • Muhammad Hassan Shabbir Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Farhan Ahmed Majeed Department of Thoracic Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Adeel Wyne Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Ahmed Raza Department of Thoracic Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Salman Tahir Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Arif Mahmood Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Hassaan Hamzai Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i4.12643

Keywords:

Artificial Pneumothorax, Operative Time, One-Lung Ventilation, Thymectomy, VATS

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of artificial pneumothorax on operating time for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) Thymectomy

Study Design: Quasi-experimental study

Duration and Place of Study: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Multan, Pakistan from Mar 2022 to Apr 2024.

Methodology: One hundred and ten patients aged between 18-65 years with different Thymic pathologies were included in this study. Patients were divided randomly into two groups; Group-O and Group-P. Group-O was subjected to one lung ventilation without artificial pneumothorax whereas Group-P was subjected to one lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax. The operating time was noted from the time of incision till closure of the skin.

. There were 62(56.36%) females and 48 (43.64%) males. The overall mean operating time was 132.34±13.23 minutes.  The mean operating time was significantly less 126.04±12.65 minutes in artificial pneumothorax than the group without artificial pneumothorax 138.41±10.78 minutes with very significant p-value (p<0.001).

Conclusion:  The use of artificial pneumothorax for VATS thymectomy is associated with a notable decrease in the operating time without an increase in postoperative complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Wei B, Cerfolio R. Robotic thymectomy. J Vis Surg 2016; 2: 136 https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2016.07.17

2. Al-Githmi IS, Alotaibi A, Habeebullah A, Bajunaid W, Jar S, Alharbi NA, et al. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy Versus Thoracoscopic Surgeries. Cureus 2023; 15(9): e45367.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45367

3. Marulli G, Comacchio GM, Rea F. Robotic thymectomy. J Vis Surg 2017; 3: 68.

https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2017.05.01

4. O'Sullivan KE, Kreaden US, Hebert AE, Eaton D, Redmond KC. A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 8(2): 174-193.

https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2019.02.04

5. Shen C, Li J, Li J, Che G. Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorac Cancer 2022; 13(2): 151-161.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14234

6. Tomescu D, Grigorescu B, Nitulescu R, Tomulescu V, Popescu I, Tulbure D et al. Hemodynamic changes induced by positive pressure capnothorax during thoracoscopic thymectomy. Chirurgia 2007; 102(3): 263-270.

7. Witt L, Osthaus WA, Schröder T, Teich N, Dingemann C, Kübler J, et al. Single-lung ventilation with carbon dioxide hemipneumothorax: hemodynamic and respiratory effects in piglets. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22(8): 793-798.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03766.x

8. Jones DR, Graeber GM, Tanguilig GG, Hobbs G, Murray GF. Effects of insufflation on hemodynamics during thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55(6): 1379-1382.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)91074-w

9. Brock H, Rieger R, Gabriel C, Pölz W, Moosbauer W, Necek S. Haemodynamic changes during thoracoscopic surgery the effects of one-lung ventilation compared with carbon dioxide insufflation. Anaesthesia 2000; 55(1): 10-16.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01123.x

10. Qi K, Wang B, Wang B, Zhang LB, Chu XY. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy versus open thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis: a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg 2016; 116(5): 282-288.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2016.1176419

11. Raja SM, Guptill JT, McConnell A, Al-Khalidi HR, Hartwig MG, Klapper JA, et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis: A Thoracic Surgery Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 113(3): 904-910.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.071

12. Zhang M, Wang H, Pan X, Wu W, Zhang H. Thoracoscopic resection of bulky thymoma assisted with artificial pneumothorax: A report of 19 consecutive cases. Oncol Lett 2016; 11(5): 3061-3063.

https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4326

13. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Sheils TM, Bass CS, Bartolucci AA. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using single-lumen endotracheal tube anesthesia. Chest 2004; 126(1): 281-285.

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.1.281

14. Cai L, Li Y, Sun L, Yang XW, Wang WB, Feng F, et al. Better perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic-esophagectomy with two-lung ventilation in semi-prone position. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9(1): 117-122.

https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.01.27

15. Zhao M, Jiang T, Li M, Yang X, Dai X, Shen Y, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic total thymectomy: two-lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2020; 29(6): 380-384.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1660681

16. Gross DJ, Zangbar B, Muthu N, Chang EH, Badami A, Stein L,et al. Saving the split: the benefits of VATS thymectomy. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11(4): 1428-1432.

https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.03.51

17. Buentzel J, Straube C, Heinz J, Roever C, Beham A, Emmert A, et al. Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery: Can a recommendation already be made? Medicine 2017; 96(24): e7161.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007161

18. Ren Y, Yan H, Ge H, Peng J, Zheng H, Zhang P. CO2 artificial pneumothorax on coagulation and fibrinolysis during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Medicine 2021; 100(2): e23784.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023784

19. Ren Y, Zhu X, Yan H, Chen L, Mao Q. Cardiorespiratory impact of intrathoracic pressure overshoot during artificial carbon dioxide pneumothorax: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22(1): 76.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01621-9

20. Lin M, Shen Y, Wang H, Fang Y, Qian C, Xu S, et al. A comparison between two lung ventilation with CO2 artificial pneumothorax and one lung ventilation during thoracic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10(3): 1912-1918. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.01.150

21. Wolfe GI, Kaminski HJ, Aban IB, Minisman G, Kuo HC, Marx A, et al. Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(6): 511-522.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602489

Downloads

Published

30-08-2025

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Shabbir MH, Majeed FA, Wyne A, Raza A, Tahir MS, Mahmood MA, et al. Effect of Artificial Pneumothorax on Operating Time for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic   (VATS) Thymectomy. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 30 [cited 2025 Oct. 7];75(4):742-6. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/12643