Systematic Classification of Dental Anatomical Variations and Their Impact on the Complexity of Simple Extractions

Saman Malik; Faiqa Hassan; Azka Haroon; Ambreen Gul; Nauman Bari; Ayesha Yasir

doi:10.51253/pafmj.v75i6.11820

Authors

Saman Malik Department of Oral Biology, HITECH-IMS Dental College, Taxilla Pakistan
Faiqa Hassan Department of Oral Medicine, HITECH-IMS Dental College
Azka Haroon Department of Oral Biology, HITECH-IMS Dental College, Taxilla Pakistan
Ambreen Gul Department of Biochemistry, HITECH-IMS Dental College, Taxilla Pakistan
Nauman Bari Department of Oral Biology, Margalla Institute of Health Sciences, Rawalpindi Pakistan
Ayesha Yasir Department of Oral Biology, Margalla Institute of Health Sciences, Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i6.11820

Keywords:

Anatomical Variations, Extraction Difficulty, Root Morphology

Abstract

Objective: To categorize anatomical variations into mild, moderate, and difficult extraction scenarios, thereby providing valuable insights to new general practitioners for appropriate treatment planning before the start of the procedure to lessen post-op complications like swelling, pain, limited mouth opening, and dry socket.

Study Design: Cross-Sectional Study.

Place and Duration of Study: Oral Maxillifacial Department, HITECH, Taxilla Pakistan, from Feb to Apr 2024.

Methodology: The study was conducted by sharing the Google form-based questionnaire among 400 dental surgeons, specialists, and consultants to give their opinions regarding the difficulty of the extraction procedure.

Results: Our study showed that 90% of clinicians reported dilaceration with maximum extraction difficulty, and 87% considered taurodontium with mild difficulty for extraction.

Conclusion: Our study provides a comprehensive understanding of anatomical variations in tooth structure, offering a detailed overview for dental practitioners, especially in practical settings, and culminating in the development of a practical guide to enhance treatment planning and outcomes. Moving forward, continuous research and collaboration within the dental community can further refine and expand upon these findings to continually improve clinical practices and patient outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Shafa S, Entezar-Almahdi E, Pourdavood AH, Vosooghinezhad B, Zarenezhad M, Jodaei A, et al. Neurosurgical Complications Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Meta-Analysis. Galen Med J 2024; 13(SP1): e3570.

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13iSP1.3570

2. Howe GL. Some Complications of Tooth Extraction: Lectures delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 27th April 1961. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1962; 30(5): 309-323.

3. Dym H, Weiss A. Exodontia: tips and techniques for better outcomes. Dental Clinics 2012; 56(1): 245–266.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.07.002

4. Abdulrahman BI, Aldahmash AM, Alghamdi HH, Hassan A, Alghamdi TABH, Ruished AF. Prevalence of Dental Anomalies among Patients visiting the Riyadh Elm University Clinics. Annals of Dental Specialty Vol 2023; 11(2): 41-45.

https://doi.org/10.51847/4wajsjzru8

5. Lindahl O, Ventä I. Level of difficulty of tooth extractions among roughly 100,000 procedures in primary care. Clin Oral Investig 2023; 27(8): 4513-4520.

https://doi:10.1007/s00784-023-05073-4

6. Park KL. Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 42(5): 251–258.

https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.5.251

7. Oreadi D. Surgical Extractions. Manual of Minor Oral Surgery for the General Dentist 2015; 37.

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/12452_21

8. Renton T, Smeeton N, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J 2001; 190(11): 607–610.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801052a

9. Sayed ME, Jurado CA, Tsujimoto A. Factors Affecting Clinical Decision-Making and Treatment Planning Strategies for Tooth Retention or Extraction: An Exploratory Review. Niger J Clin Pract 2020; 23(12): 1629–1638.

https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_649_19

10. Massaro C, Janson G, Yatabe M, Calil LR, Oliveira TM, Garib D. Dental anomaly pattern and multiple ectopic teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020; 158(1): 102–113.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.032

11. Albannai, Hussain A. Exodontia: Tips and Pearls. ARC J Dent Sci 2020; 5(2): 4-10.

https://doi.org/10.20431/2456-0030.0502002

12. Chrcanovic BR, Freire‐Maia B. Considerations of maxillary tuberosity fractures during extraction of upper molars: a literature review. Dent Traumatol 2011; 27(5): 393–398.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01012.x

13. Saqib S, Arshed M, Ahmad MB, Nawadat K, Niazi M, Ahmed T. The Occurrence of Root Dilacerations in Patients Reporting to Islamabad Dental Hospital: A Retrospective Study. Found Uni J Dent 2023; 3(2): 88–94.

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023173682

14. Çelik B, Çelik ME. Root Dilaceration Using Deep Learning: A Diagnostic Approach. Applied Sciences 2023; 13(14): 8260.

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023173682

15. Al-Mutairi THA. Influences of tooth anatomy in endodontic treatment. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2023; 9(3): 27-31.

https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i3a.1781

16. Al Omari T, AlKhader M, Ateş AA, Wahjuningrum DA, Dkmak A, Khaled W, et al. A CBCT-based cross-sectional study on the prevalence and anatomical features of C-shaped molar among Jordanian. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 17137.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20921-1

17. Jain A. Principles and techniques of exodontia. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 259–297.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_13

18. Bhansali SP, Bhansali S, Tiwari A. Review of difficulty indices for removal of impacted third molars and a new classification of difficulty indices. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2021; 20: 167–179.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01452-6