The Diagnostic Accuracy of Shoulder Ultrasound For Rotator Cuff Pathology Compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Gold Standard

Sadaf Aziz; Falak Nigar; Sadaf Khan Baloch; Atif Latif; Mariam Shafiq; Ejaz Ashraf Mallhi

doi:10.51253/pafmj.v75iSUPPL-7.11608

Authors

Sadaf Aziz Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
Falak Nigar Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Murree/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
Sadaf Khan Baloch Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
Atif Latif Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
Mariam Shafiq Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
Ejaz Ashraf Mallhi Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Murree/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75iSUPPL-7.11608

Keywords:

Diagnostic Imaging, Rotator Cuff Injuries, Shoulder Injuries, Ultrasonography

Abstract

Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the local population for rotator cuff injury keeping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a gold standard.

Study Design: Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan Institute of Medical Sciences- CIMS) Multan, Pakistan, from Apr to Oct 2022.

Methodology: A total of 169 patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff injury were selected by consecutive sampling. Subjects aged 25 to 65 years of either gender presenting with clinically suspected rotator cuff tear were selected for the study. Patients with prosthetic implants, pacemakers and fractures of clavicle, scapula, proximal humerus or having contraindications for MRI were excluded from the study. Ultrasound and MRI were done on each patient by separate operators. Data on diagnoses was collected and analyzed on SPSS v 23.

Results: A total sample of 169 patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff injury were enrolled. The mean age was 37.39± 8.97 years (range 25-65) of which 127(74.15%), were between 25 to 45 years of age. There was a preponderance of males: 120(71%). The diagnostic parameters for ultrasound were sensitivity-92.86%, specificity-90.59%, PPV-90.70%, NPV-92.77% and diagnostic accuracy-91.72%.

Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound is comparable to that of MRI for detecting rotator cuff tears, suggesting a significant role for ultrasound in assessing rotator cuff tears.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006

2. Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H, Fukuda M, Seki N, Kikuchi K et al. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village J Orthop 2013; 10(1): 8–12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008

3. Wani Z, Abdullah M, Habeebullah A, Kalogriantis S. Rotator cuff tears: Review of epidemiology, clinical assessment and operative treatment. Trauma 2016; 18(3): 190–204.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1460408615596770

4. Farooqi AS, Lee A, Novikov D et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9(10).

https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211035106

5. Lucas J, van Doorn P, Hegedus E, Lewis J, van der Windt D. A systematic review of the global prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23(1): 1073.

https://doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05973-8

6. Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Johnston RV, Hanchard NC, Faloppa F. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013(9): CD009020.

https://doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2

7. Dang A, Davies M. Rotator Cuff Disease: Treatment Options and Considerations. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2018; 26(3): 129-133.

https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000207

8. Fischer CA, Weber MA, Neubecker C, Bruckner T, Tanner M, Zeifang F et al. Ultrasound vs. MRI in the assessment of rotator cuff structure prior to shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop 2015; 12(1): 23-30. https://doi:10.1016/j.jor.2015.01.003

9. Newton JB, Fryhofer GW, Rodriguez AB, Kuntz AF, Soslowsky LJ. Mechanical properties of the different rotator cuff tendons in the rat are similarly and adversely affected by age. J Biomech 2021; 117: 110249.

https://doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110249

10. Fitzpatrick LA, Atinga A, White L, Henry PDG, Probyn L. Rotator Cuff Injury and Repair. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26(5): 585-596.

https://doi:10.1055/s-0042-1756167

11. Müller PE, Konvalin LJ. Schultergelenk – klinische Einführung [Shoulder-clinical introduction]. Radiologie 2024; 64(2): 93-100.

https://doi:10.1007/s00117-023-01219-3

12. Chauhan NS, Ahluwalia A, Sharma YP, Thakur L. A Prospective Comparative Study of High Resolution Ultrasound and MRI in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears in a Tertiary Hospital of North India. Pol J Radiol 2016; 81: 491-497.

https://doi:10.12659/PJR.897830

13. Aminzadeh B, Najafi S, Moradi A, Abbasi B. Evaluation of diagnostic precision of ultrasound for rotator cuff disorders in patients with shoulder pain. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2020; 8(6): 689-695. https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2020.42894.2166

14. Saraya S, El Bakry R. Ultrasound: Can it replace MRI in the evaluation of the rotator cuff tears. Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med 2016; 47(1): 193-201.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2015.11.010

15. Prashanth S, Prasad S, Nisha P, Suresha B, Nataraj AR. Comparative study of ultrasound and MRI in assessing rotator cuff tear. Int J Contem Med Surg Radiol 2017; 2(3): 70-74.

https://doi.org/10.48047/NQ.2022.20.11.NQ66954

16. Ganesh J, Patil SD, Muchchandi R, Naik S. Diagnostic Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Study Conducted in the Population of Vijayapura. Cureus 2024; 16(8): e68302.

https://doi:10.7759/cureus.68302

17. Madhavi P, Patil P. Diagnostic Accuracy of USG and MRI for the Detection of Rotator Cuff Injury. Cureus 2024; 16(8): e68199.

https://doi:10.7759/cureus.68199

18. Mohtasib RS, Alzahrani AM, Asiri YN, Rayes ZF, Alshaalan MA. Accuracy of shoulder ultrasound examination for diagnosis of rotator cuff pathologies: a single-center retrospective study. Ann Saudi Med 2019; 39(3): 162-171.

https://doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2019.162

19. Zoga AC, Kamel SI, Hynes JP, Kavanagh EC, O'Connor PJ, Forster BB et el . The Evolving Roles of MRI and Ultrasound in First-Line Imaging of Rotator Cuff Injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217(6): 1390-1400.

https://doi:10.2214/AJR.21.25606

20. Naunton J, Harrison C, Britt H, Haines T, Malliaras P. General practice management of rotator cuff related shoulder pain: A reliance on ultrasound and injection guided care. PLoS One 2020; 15(1): e0227688. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227688

21. Toh Y. Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging as First-Line Imaging Strategies for Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Practices, Economic Efficiency, and Future Perspectives. Cureus 2024; 16(4): e59231.

https://doi:10.7759/cureus.59231

22. Hapani H, Sood M, Trivedi A, Chawla A, Virda I, Radadiya K. Ultrasound, MRI and Arthroscopic Correlation of Rotator Cuff Tears. Int J Contemp Med Res 2017; 4(3): 650-652.