Clinical and Electroencephalographic Characteristics of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in   a Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors

  • Fawad Ahmad Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Imran Ahmad Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Saima Shafat Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Jahanzeb Liaqat Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Naveed Ahmed Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Jalil Khan Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i6.11586

Keywords:

EEG, Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy, Myoclonic Jerks

Abstract

Objective: To determine the clinical and electroencephalographic features in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) patients

Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Neurology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Jul to Dec 2022.

Methodology: The participants of this study were diagnosed with JME.  Patients with hypoxic brain injury, metabolic diseases, family history of progressive myoclonic epilepsy, and abnormal neurological examination or neuroimaging were excluded from study. Data was recorded from consenting patients on a pre-designed proforma recording various parameters.

Results: Among 135 patients, 84 were females (62.2%) and 51 were males (37.8%). Mean age at diagnosis was 19.38±5.40 years. Positive family history was present in 22.2%. Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures (GTCS) were most common seizure type (53.3%) at diagnosis where as GTCS + Myoclonic jerks (MJ) were most common types (68.9%) during disease course. Classic JME was present in 81.5% cases. Lack of sleep was most common precipitating factor (51.9%). Spike and polyspike slow wave activity was most common EEG abnormality in 44.5%. Majority were fit free on either valproic acid (42.2%) or levetiracetam (38.5%) whereas 20.7% had refractory seizures. Anxiety was most common associated psychiatric co-morbidity present in 14.1%. 

Conclusion: JME can be diagnosed by carefully eliciting history of MJ along with GTCS and finding of spike and polyspike slow wave activity in EEG. Majority achieve remission from fits either on valproic acid or levetiracetam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Elmali AD, Auvin S, Bast T, Rubboli G, Koutroumanidis M. How to diagnose and classify idiopathic (genetic) generalized epilepsies. Epileptic Disord 2020; 22(4): 399–420.

https://doi.org/10.1684/epd.2020.1192

2. Cemile H, Ozlem A, Ibrahim Hakkae B. Diagnostic difficulties in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Sanamed 2020; 15(3): 299–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v15i3.456

3. Xu L, Guo D, Liu Y yan, Qiao D dan, Ye J yi, Xue R. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and sleep. Epilepsy Behav 2018; 80: 326-330.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.008

4. Pietrafusa N, La Neve A, de Palma L, Boero G, Luisi C, Vigevano F, et al. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: Long-term prognosis and risk factors. Brain Dev 2021; 43(6): 688–697.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2021.02.005

5. Murthy JMK. Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy: Myoclonic Status Epilepticus without Coma - Report of Three Cases. J Epilepsy Res 2020; 10(2): 92-95. https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.20015

6. Fayad C, Saad K, Kahwagi GJ, Hallit S, Griffin D, Abou-Khalil R, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors related to first-line drugs refractoriness in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). PLoS One 2024; 19(4): e0300930.

https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300930

7. Rathore C, Prakash S, Makwana P. Prevalence of photoparoxysmal response in patients with epilepsy: Effect of the underlying syndrome and treatment status. Seizure 2020; 82: 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.006

8. Stephen LJ, Brodie MJ. Pharmacological management of the genetic generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults. CNS Drugs 2020; 34(2): 147–161.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-020-00698-5

9. Stevelink R, Koeleman BPC, Sander JW, Jansen FE, Braun KPJ. Refractory juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors. Eur J Neurol 2019; 26(6): 856–864.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13811

10. Ascoli M, Mastroianni G, Gasparini S, Striano P, Cianci V, Neri S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to drug-resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2021; 21(11): 1265-1273.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2021.1931126

11. Shahnaz, Sher K, Sattar RA. Clinical and EEG characteristics of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy. Pakistan J Med Sci 2014; 30(1): 12–15. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4465

12. Abdalla SF, Elmagzoub MS, Babikir HE-H. Clinical Presentations and Factors Responsible for Delays in Diagnosis of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy among Sudanese Patients. J Neurol Neurosci 2017; 8(4): 209.

https://doi.org/10.21767/2171-6625.1000209

13. Jayalakshmi SS, Srinivasa Rao B SS. Focal clinical and electroencephalographic features in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 2010; 122(2): 115–123.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01270.x

14. Camfield CS, Striano P, Camfield PR. Epidemiology of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2013; 28(1): S15–S17.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.06.024

15. Reddy DS, Thompson W, Calderara G. Molecular mechanisms of sex differences in epilepsy and seizure susceptibility in chemical, genetic and acquired epileptogenesis. Neurosci Lett 2021; 750: 135753.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135753

16. Shafait S, Alamgir W, Ahmad I, Arif S, Liaqat J, Hashmat A. A study on comparative yields of standard short-term electroencephalogram and long-term electroencephalogram recording in suspected epilepsy patients. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2021; 71(5): 1727-1731.

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i5.5921

17. Montalenti E, Imperiale D, Rovera A, Bergamasco B, Benna P. Clinical features, EEG findings and diagnostic pitfalls in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a series of 63 patients. J Neurol Sci 2001; 184(1): 65–70.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-510x(00)00496-2

18. Silvennoinen K, de Lange N, Zagaglia S, Balestrini S, Androsova G, Wassenaar M, et al. Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia Open 2019; 4(3): 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12349

19. Milano C, Turco F, Pizzanelli C, Bonanni E, Siciliano G, Fornai F, et al. Response to levetiracetam or lamotrigine in subjects with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy previously treated with valproic acid: A single-center retrospective study. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 115: 107706.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107706

20. Chowdhury A, Brodie MJ. Pharmacological outcomes in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: Support for sodium valproate. Epilepsy Res 2016; 119: 62–66.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.012

21. Cerulli Irelli E, Cocchi E, Morano A, Casciato S, Fanella M, Albini M, et al. Valproate impact and sex-dependent seizure remission in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. J Neurol Sci 2020; 415: 116940.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.116940

22. Syvertsen M, Selmer K, Enger U, Nakken KO, Pal DK, Smith A, et al. Psychosocial complications in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2019; 90: 122–128.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.11.022

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Ahmad F, Imran Ahmad, Shafat S, Liaqat J, Ahmed N, Khan J. Clinical and Electroencephalographic Characteristics of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in   a Tertiary Care Hospital. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Jan. 2];75(6):1131-5. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/11586