Hybrid Versus Traditional Teaching in the Subject Of Anatomy: A Comparison Based On Results Of Students

Authors

  • Hina Siddique Department of Anatomy, Central Park Medical College, Lahore Pakistan
  • Shamaila Hasnain Department of Community Medicine, Central Park Medical College, Lahore Pakistan
  • Rafia Minhas Department of Medical Education, Central Park Medical College, Lahore Pakistan
  • Noor Shahid Department of Statistics, Central Park Medical College, Lahore Pakistan
  • Rabia Hanif Department of Medical Education, Akhtar Saeed Medical College, Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Jabran Javaid Sidhu Department of Physiology, Akhtar Saeed Medical College, Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i2.10879

Keywords:

MEDICAL EDUCATION, ANATOMY, MODULAR, ASSESSMENT

Abstract

Objective: To assess the results of hybrid and traditional teaching systems and their implementation based on student
evaluation in anatomy.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Anatomy Department, Central Park Medical College, Lahore Pakistan, from Jun 2022 to Jun
2023.

Methodology: The study was conducted on the first-year medical students of 2021 who were taught via integrated modular
systems at the level of temporal coordination. Teaching strategies were changed from didactic lectures to interactive largegroup lectures and small-group discussions. The results of their continuous assessment and professional exams were
compared and analysed.

Results: The proportion of failed students in the Modular-Group was 20.8%, whereas 79.2% in the Non-Modular-Group. The
learning system was statistically significantly related to performance in professional exams. A significant difference exists
between internal assessment and professional exam scores of students in traditional and modular teaching. The relationship
between the results of internal assessment and professional exams was highly positive (r=0.79) and statistically significant
(p<0.001).

Conclusion: Students' performance was better in assessment throughout the year in the traditional system, whereas the
professional exam results were better in the modular system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended Learning

Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education:

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020;

(8): e16504. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504

Hitzblech T, Maaz A, Rollinger T, Ludwig S, Dettmer S, Wurl W,

et al. The modular curriculum of medicine at the Charité Berlin -

a project report based on an across-semester student evaluation.

GMS J Med Educ 2019; 36(5): 54.

https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001262

Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse S. Learning

styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ 2013; 13(1): 1-6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-42

Maaz A, Hitzblech T, Arends P, Degel A, Ludwig S,

Mossakowski A et al. Moving a mountain: Practical insights into

mastering a major curriculum reform at a large European

medical university. Med Teach 2018; 40(5): 453-460.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1440077

Karthikeyan K, Kumar A. Integrated modular teaching in

dermatology for undergraduate students: A novel approach.

Indian Dermatol Online J 2014; 5(3): 266-270.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5178.137774

Srikanth S, Thirunaaukarasu, Behera B, Mahajan P. Modular

teaching: an alternative to routine teaching method for undergraduate medical students. Indian J Community Med 2011;

(3): 237-238. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.86529

Fatima U, Naz M, Zafar H, Fatima A, Khan RR. Student's

perception about Modular teaching and various instructional

strategies in the subject of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Professional Med J 2020; 27(01): 40-45.

https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2019.27.01.3162

Dejene W. The practice of modularized curriculum in higher

education institution: Active learning and continuous

assessment in focus. Cogent Educ 2019; 6(1).

https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052

Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical

education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach 2015; 37(4): 312-322.

https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.970998

Gahutu JB. Physiology teaching and learning experience in a

new modular curriculum at the National University of Rwanda.

Adv Physiol Educ 2010; 34(1): 11-14.

https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00093.2009

Uneeb SN, Zainab S, Khoso A, Basit A. Knowledge scores in

annual and modular curriculum among medical students from

Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2021; 71(2(B)): 681-685.

https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.1416

Owolabi J, Bekele A. Implementation of Innovative Educational

Technologies in Teaching of Anatomy and Basic Medical

Sciences During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Developing

Country: The COVID-19 Silver Lining? Adv Med Educ Pract

; 12: 619-625. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S295239

Boscolo-Berto R, Tortorella C, Porzionato A, Stecco C, Picardi

EEE, Macchi V, et al. The additional role of virtual to traditional

dissection in teaching anatomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43(4): 469-479.

https://doi.org/0.1007/s00276-020-02551-2

Munir R, Ghafoor N, Niazi IM, Saeed I, Yousaf A. Approach of

MBBS Students receiving Modular vs Students receiving

Conventional Mode of education towards Health Research: A

Comparative Study. J Rawalpindi Med Coll 2021; 25(3): 328-32.

https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v25i3.1456

Allison S, Mueller C, Lackey-Cornelison W. Structure and

function: how to design integrated anatomy and physiology

modules for the gross anatomy laboratory. Front Physiol 2023;

: 1250139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1250139

Brooks WS, Woodley KT, Jackson JR, Hoesley CJ. Integration of

gross anatomy in an organ system-based medical curriculum:

strategies and challenges. Anat Sci Educ 2015; 8(3): 266-274

https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1483

Haque A, Mansoor S, Malik F, Ahmed J, Haque Z. Comparison

of Quality of Life of Medical Students in Annual and Modular

System in Public Sector Medical Colleges in Karachi, Pakistan.

Int J Med Stud;10(3):258–263.

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2022.1028

Junaidi I. Medical Colleges divided over integrated modular

curriculum.[Internet] DAWN. 2018

https://www.dawn.com/news/1391487/medical-collegesdivided-over-integrated-modular-curriculum (Accessed on June

, 2023)

Serrat MA, Dom AM, Buchanan JT Jr, Williams AR, Efaw ML,

Richardson LL, et al. Independent learning modules enhance

student performance and understanding of anatomy. Anat Sci

Educ 2014; 7(5): 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.143

Downloads

Published

29-04-2024

How to Cite

1.
Siddique H, Hasnain S, Minhas R, Shahid N, Hanif R, Javaid Sidhu MJ. Hybrid Versus Traditional Teaching in the Subject Of Anatomy: A Comparison Based On Results Of Students. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2024 Apr. 29 [cited 2024 May 24];74(2):459-63. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/10879

Issue

Section

Original Articles