Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy as an Alternative to Open Esophagectomy: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75iSUPPL-1.10386Keywords:
Carcinoma Oesophagus, Minimal Invasive Esophagectomy, Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.Abstract
Objective: To share our experience regarding Minimally invasive Esophagectomy, being one of the leading centres in the country.
Study Design: Prospective observational study.
Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan 2019 to Dec 2021.
Methodology: After obtaining approval from ethical review committee all patients who underwent minimal invasive esophagectomy were included in the study whereas those who underwent open esophagectomy were not included in the study.
Results: Total of 104 patients underwent Minimal invasive esophagectomy out of which 83(79.81%) were for malignant diseases and 21(20.19%) for benign disorders. Overall mortality rate was 6.73 % while morbidity rate was 15.40%. Our mean operative time was 240.00+30.00 minutes and average hospital stay was 7.00+3.00 days.
Conclusion: Minimal invasive esophagectomy is a safe alternative to open esophagectomy with low mortality and morbidity rate with satisfactory results.
Downloads
References
J. B. Putnam Jr., D. M. Suell, M. J. McMurtrey et al., “Comparison of three techniques of esophagectomy within a residency training program,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 319–325, 1994.
Soltani E, Mahmoodzadeh H, Jabbari Nooghabi A, Jabbari Nooghabi M, Ravankhah Moghaddam K, Hassanzadeh Haddad E. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal SCC: outcomes and complications. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 17(1): 150.
Subramanyeshwar RT, Raju KVVN, Patnaik SC, Saksena AR, Pratap RR, Rayani BK et al. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12(2): 335-349.
M. B. Orringer, B. Marshall, A. C. Chang, J. Lee, A. Pickens, and C. L. Lau. “Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 246, no. 3, pp. 363–372, 2007.
Mederos MA, de Virgilio MJ, Shenoy R, Ye L, Toste PA, Mak SS, Booth MS, et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(11): e2129228.
https//doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.
Braghetto, A. Csendes, G. Cardemil, P. Burdiles, O. Korn, and H. Valladares. “Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1681–1686, 2006.
Thammineedi SR, Patnaik SC, Nusrath S. Minimal Invasive Esophagectomy-a New Dawn of EsophagealSurgery. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020; 11(4): 615-624.
https//doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01191-7
Mu J, Yuan Z, Zhang B, Li N, Lyu F, Mao Y, at al. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer Chin Med J 2014; 127: 747-752.
Gockel I, Exner C, Junginger T. Morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: a risk analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2005; 3: 37. https//doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-3-37
Xie J, Zhang L, Liu Z, et al. Advantages of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer: propensity score matching analysis of 169 cases. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20(1): 52.
Dolan DP, Swanson SJ. The modern approach to esophagectomy-review of the shift towards minimally invasive surgery. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9(10): 901.
https//doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.143
J. D. Luketich, M. Alvelo-Rivera, P. O. Buenaventura et al., “Minimally invasive esophagectomy : outcomes in 222 patients,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 238, no. 4, pp. 486–495, 2003.
Yin Z, Yang RM, Jiang YQ, Chen Q, Cai HR. Perioperative Clinical Results of Transcervical and Transhiatal Esophagectomy versus Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study [published correction appears in Int J Gen Med 2022; 15: 7797-7798]. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15: 3393-3404.
Horstmann O, Verreet P, Becker H, Ohmann C, Röher HD. Transhiatal oesophagectomy compared with transthoracic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg 1995; 161: 557–567.
S. F. Schoppmann, G. Prager, F. Langer, M. Riegler, E. Fleischman, and J. Zacherl, “Fifty-five minimally invasive esophagectomies: a single centre experience,” Anticancer Research, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 2719–2725, 2009.
U. Zingg, A. McQuinn, D. DiValentino et al., “Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 911–919, 2009.
R. Farrukh, S. Syed ,A. Aamir, K.Shahid, K. Ali. (2014). Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: The First Experience from Pakistan. International journal of surgical oncology 2014: 864705. https//doi.org/10.1155/2014/864705
Warner S, Chang YH, Paripati H, Ross H, Ashman J, Harold K, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 439-445.
S. F. Schoppmann, G. Prager, F. B. Langer et al., “Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center casecontrolled study,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3044–3053, 2010.
Henriques A, Fuhro F, Godinho C, Campos AL, Waisberg J. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination after esophagectomy. Acta Cir Bras 2012; 27: 343–349
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sohail Saqib Chatha, Bilal Umair, Farhan Ahmed Majeed, Rashid Husnain, Farhan Ullah, Arshaman Rauf, Khawja Jawad
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.