Perceptions of Undergraduate Students Regarding the Inclusion of Clinical Audit in their Curriculum

Authors

  • Mansoor Dilnawaz Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Ayesha Kanwal Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Hajra Saeed Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Taha Mansoor Department of Internal Medicine, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad Pakistan
  • Madha Mansoor Department of Dentistry, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore Medical College, Lahore/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.10118

Keywords:

Curriculum, Clinical audit, Exploratory sequential mixed methods study, Perception, Students

Abstract

Objective: To find out undergraduate students' perceptions regarding the inclusion of clinical audits in their curriculum.

Study Design: Exploratory sequential mixed methods study.

Place and Duration of study: Combined Military Hospital, Lahore Pakistan, from Dec 2022 to Mar 2023.

Methodology: The first phase of the study comprised a quantitative research questionnaire regarding undergraduate students' perceptions about the inclusion of a clinical audit in their curriculum. These perceptions were explored in depth in the second phase with focus group discussions (FGD). Thirty students participated in the study, ten from the fourth year and twenty from the final year MBBS.

Results: The study included 30 participants. The results showed that (24, 80%) of participants were able to develop skills as
team members, (22, 73%) were able to identify audit topics, collect data, write audit reports and understand conflicts of
interest, and (21, 70%) were able to write audit proposal and develop skill in life long audit learning. The key themes emerging from clinical audit focus group discussions (FGD) were better clinical care, patient safety, lack of understanding about audit by students and faculty and improper implementation mechanisms.

Conclusion: In conclusion, a clinical audit promotes a safe, good-quality, and evidence-based environment for patient care. It also decreases the risk of clinical negligence and should be incorporated as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jafary MH, Jawaid SA. Departmental clinical audit, Audit

principles and the present status in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2005;

(1): 1-5.

Anjum Q. Clinical audit: Time to mandate. J Pak Med Assoc 2012;

(7): 637.

Van Gelderen SC, Zegers M, Robben PB, Boeijen W, Westert GP,

Wollersheim HC, et al. Important factors for effective patient

safety governance auditing: a questionnaire survey. BMC Health

Serv Res 2018; 18(1): 798.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3577-9.

Mak DB, Miflin B. Clinical audit in the final year of

undergraduate medical education: towards better care of future

generations. Med Teach 2012; 34(4): e251-257.

https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.660216.

Ross P, Hubert J, Saunders M, Wong WL. The importance of a

supportive environment in clinical audit: a pilot study of doctors'

engagement with the NHS National PET-CT audit programme.

Nucl Med Commun 2014; 35(10): 1052-1057.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000161.

Gachau S, Ayieko P, Gathara D, Mwaniki P, Ogero M, Akech S, et

al. Does audit and feedback improve the adoption of

recommended practices? Evidence from a longitudinal

observational study of an emerging clinical network in Kenya.

BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2(4): e000468.

http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000468.

Scally G, Donaldson LJ. Clinical governance and the drive for

quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ 1998;

(7150): 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7150.61

Thornley P, Quinn A, Elley K. A qualitative evaluation of

foundation dentists' and training programme directors'

Perceptions of Undergraduate Students Regarding

Pak Armed Forces Med J 2023; 73(6): 1834

perceptions of clinical audit in general dental practice. Br Dent J

; 219(4): 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.647.

Paton JY, Ranmal R, Dudley J, RCPCH Clinical Standards

Committee. Clinical audit: still an important tool for improving

healthcare. Arch Dis Childhood Educ Pract 2015; 100(2): 83-88.

http://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-305194 .

Henley E. A quality improvement curriculum for medical

students. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002; 28(1): 42-48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28005-0.

Mirza IA, Usmani A. Attribution to success and failure among

medical students. Experience at Bahria University Medical and

Dental College Karachi. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2017; 6(67):

-898.

Jonathan Potter DM, MA CF, Ferris M. Local clinical audit:

Handbook for physicians. Royal College of Physicians,

London; 2010.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Great Britain).

Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Radcliffe Medical

Press; 2016.

Moon JA. Reflection in learning and professional development:

Theory and practice. Frist edition. Routledge; 2000. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203822296 .

Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J,

French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional

practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev

; (6): CD000259.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.

Tor E, Steketee C, Mak D. Clinical audit project in undergraduate

medical education curriculum: an assessment validation study.

Int J Med Educ 2016; 7(1): 309.

https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.57da.c89a.

Alam MM. Audit of the audits. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad

; 27(2): 499-500.

Rao RK, AIva J, Sudhakar C, Lhamo N, Jose DM, Mathew J, et al.

Perception of staff nurses regarding quality audit process in

hospitals of mangalore district, karnataka. Nurs J India 2012;

(5): 204-205.

Gude WT, Roos-Blom MJ, van der Veer SN, Dongelmans DA, de

Jonge E, Francis JJ, et al. Health professionals’ perceptions about

their clinical performance and the influence of audit and

feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based

study in Dutch intensive care units. Implement Sci 2018; 13: 33.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0727-8.

Wong LP. Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical

research. Singapore Med J 2008; 49(3): 256-260.

Rosaline SB. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ 2005; 39(7):

-750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02200.x.

McLafferty I. Focus group interviews as a data collecting

strategy. J Advan Nurs 2004; 48(2): 187-194.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03186.x.

Creswel JW. Research Design: Qualitative. Quantitative, and

Mixed Methods Approaches. Third edition, Sage Publications;

Johnson RB, Christensen L. Educational research: Quantitative,

qualitative, and mixed approaches. Fifth edition, Sage

Publications; 2019.

Schifferdecker KE. Using mixed methods research in medical

education: basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ 2009;

(7): 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03386.x.

Alinnor EA, Ogaji DS. Physicians’ knowledge, attitude and

practice of clinical audit in a tertiary health facility in a

developing country: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J 2022;

: 22. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.43.22.33800.

McLafferty I. Focus group interviews as a data collecting

strategy. J Advan Nurs 2004; 48(2): 187-194.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03186.x.

Jouhari Z, Haghani F, Changiz T. Factors affecting self-regulated

learning in medical students: a qualitative study. Med Educ

Online 2015; 20(1): 28694.

https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.28694.

Sitticharoon C, Srisuma S, Kanavitoon S, Summachiwakij S.

Exploratory study of factors related to educational scores of first

preclinical year medical students. Advan Physiolo Educa 2014 ;

(1): 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00162.2012.

Gupta A, Saks NS. Exploring medical student decisions

regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures.

Med Teach 2013; 35(9): 767-771.

https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.801940.

Patel R, Tarrant C, Bonas S, Yates J, Sandars J. The struggling

student: a thematic analysis from the self‐regulated learning

perspective. Med Educ 2015; 49(4): 417-426.

https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12651.

Ivers NM, Maybee A. Engaging patients to select measures for a

primary care audit and feedback initiative. CMAJ 2018;

(Suppl): S42-S43. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180334.

Lord J, Littlejohns P. Impact of hospital and community provider

based clinical audit programmes: perceptions of doctors, nurses

and other health professionals. Int J Qual Health Care 1996; 8(6):

-535. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/8.6.527.

Millard A. Perceptions of clinical audit: a preliminary evaluation.

J Clin Effect 1996; 1(3): 96-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb020845.

Chong JA, Chew JK, Ravindranath S, Pau A. Clinical Audit

Teaching in Record–Keeping for Dental Undergraduates at

International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. J

Dent Educ 2014; 78(2): 206-212.

https://doi.org/10.1002/j.00220337.2014.78.2.tb05671.x.

Taylor L, Jones S. Clinical governance in practice: closing the loop

with integrated audit systems. J Psychiatr Mental Health Nurs

; 13(2): 228-233.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00945.x.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2023

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Dilnawaz M, Kanwal A, Saeed H, Mansoor T, Mansoor M. Perceptions of Undergraduate Students Regarding the Inclusion of Clinical Audit in their Curriculum. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 28 [cited 2024 Jul. 27];73(6):1830-4. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/10118