Evaluation of Gram Stain Error Rates of Clinical Specimens

Authors

  • Rabia Sajjad Combined Military Hospital, Attock/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Gohar Zaman KRL Hospital, Islamabad Pakistan
  • Irfan Ali Mirza Armed Forces Institute of Pathology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Wajid Hussain Armed Forces Institute of Pathology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Umar Khurshid Armed Forces Institute of Pathology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Asim Shehzad Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i6.5815

Keywords:

Clinical specimens, Errors, Gram stain

Abstract

Objective: To determine important errors in initial Gram staining of clinical specimens and evaluate the types of Gram-stain errors.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Microbiology Department, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Aug 2018 to Feb 2019.

Methodology: Gram staining and culture inoculation of all specimens were performed per recommended guidelines. The Gram stain results on day-0 were compared with the results of the culture on day-2. There was no discrepancy if similar organisms were obtained on culture as on Gram stain. Nevertheless, if the Gram stain and culture results were not similar, it was termed a discrepancy. The consultant microbiologist reviewed all discrepant slides, and if not resolved, possible causes of error were sought, and the results documented.

Results: Of the total 300 clinical specimens, errors were observed in the initial gram staining of 29 specimens (9.7%), whereas 271(90.3%) specimens were error-free. Upon evaluating these 29 errors, 11(38.0%) were observer errors which were resolved when reviewed by a consultant microbiologist. 14(48.0%) were technical errors, and 4(14.0%) results were discrepant due to the presence of anaerobic organisms, missed on initial aerobic cultures.

Conclusion: The frequency of Gram stain errors in our study (9.7%) is not very high; nevertheless, it can have severe consequences in critical samples from seriously ill patients if wrong empirical antimicrobial treatment is begun based on a wrong initial Gram stain result.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

29-12-2022

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Sajjad R, Zaman G, Mirza IA, Hussain W, Khurshid U, Shehzad A. Evaluation of Gram Stain Error Rates of Clinical Specimens. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 29 [cited 2024 Nov. 3];72(6):1945-48. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/5815