TITANIUM MESH VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS BONE GRAFT CRANIOPLASTY

  • Babar Shamim Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Awais Ali Khan Combined Military Hospital, Terbela Pakistan
  • Muhammad Junaid Mushtaq Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Amjad Saeed Abbassi Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Ali Ahmed Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Maria Shahzadi Military Hospital, Terbela Pakistan
Keywords: Autologous bone graft, Abscess formation, Cranioplasty, titanium mesh, Post-op pain, Seroma formation

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of titanium mesh to autologous bone grafting in cranioplasty and assessing complications like seroma and abscess formations and subjective measures of pain.

Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Neurosurgery department, CMH Rawalpindi, from Aug 2017 to Dec 2018.

Methodology: Twenty patients (Women=12, Men=8) were randomly assigned to Titanium Mesh (TM) group and 20 patients (Women=7, Men=13) to Autologous Bone Graft (ABG) group. All were subjected to cranioplasty using Titenium Mesh and Autologous Bone Graft procedures to assess cranial seroma and abscess formation and pain.

Results: Comparison of pain on day 3 showed seven (35%) patients in titenium mesh group experienced pain compared to 14 (70%) patients in the autologous bone graft group, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). Similarly, a comparison on day 7, revealed that pain in the titenium mesh group reduced to five (25%) patients compared to 11 patients (55%) in the autologous bone graft group, which again was statistically significant (p<0.001). Four (20%) patients in titenium mesh group and 7 (35%) patients in autologous bone graft group developed seroma on day 3 and the difference was significant (p<0.001). Two (10%) patients in titenium mesh group and five (25%) patients in autologous bone graft group developed abscess, which was significantly different (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Cranioplasty using titenium mesh is better than autologous bone graft because complications like seroma, abscess and pain are attenuated in surgical cohorts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-08-20
How to Cite
Shamim, B., Khan, A., Mushtaq, M., Abbassi, A., Ahmed, A., & Shahzadi, M. (2020). TITANIUM MESH VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS BONE GRAFT CRANIOPLASTY. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 70(4), 1077-80. Retrieved from https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/5095
Section
Original Articles