@article{Iftikhar_Aslam_Rehman_Ali_Abbass_Haider_2021, title={COMPARISON OF HAEMODYNAMIC STABILITY WITH 0.5% AND 0.75% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN WOMEN UNDERGOING CAESAREAN SECTION}, volume={71}, url={https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/5900}, DOI={10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5900}, abstractNote={<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To compare the effect of 0.5% and 0.75% hyperbaric Bupivacaine on haemodynamic stability in terms of mean systolic blood pressure and heart rate recorded at 4 min in patients undergoing caesarian section in spinal anesthesia.</p> <p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Quasi experimental study.</p> <p><strong>Place and Duration of Study:</strong> Department of Anaesthesiology, Combined Military Hospital, Malir, from Jul to Dec 2018.</p> <p><strong>Methodology:</strong> The patients were assigned in two groups (A and B) using lottery method. Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine solution. Group B received 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine solution. Spinal anaesthesia was given, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 23. Both groups were compared for mean systolic blood pressure and heart rate by using independent sample t-test.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> The mean age of patients was 29.62 ± 6.21 years in 0.75% Bupivacaine group while 29.31 ± 6.20 years in 0.5% Bupivacaine group. The mean systolic blood pressure of patients was 111.63 ± 5.96 mmHg in 0.75% Bupivacaine group while 117.16 ± 7.12 mmHg in 0.5% Bupivacaine group. The difference was significant in both groups (p-value <0.05). The mean heart rate of patients was 92.27 ± 4.71 beats per min (bpm) in 0.75% Bupivacaine group while 97.68 ± 4.58 bpm in 0.5% Bupivacaine group. The difference was significant in both groups (p-value <0.05).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine was better than 0.75% hyperbaric Bupivacaine solution in spinal anaesthesia during caesarean section.</p>}, number={6}, journal={Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal}, author={Iftikhar, Hina and Aslam, Aneel and Rehman, Habib Ur and Ali, Zulfiqar and Abbass, Mohammad Ali and Haider, Zulfiqar}, year={2021}, month={Dec.}, pages={2078–81} }