EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR METHYLERGOMETRINE IN PREVENTION OF PRIMARY POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE

Authors

  • Rabiah Anwar Military Hospital Rawalpindi
  • Mamoona Mushtaq Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi
  • Ambreen Anwer Military Hospital Rawalpindi
  • Adiba Akhtar Khalil Military Hospital Rawalpindi

Keywords:

Post partum hemorrage, Misoprostol, Methylergometrine

Abstract

Objectives: To compare efficacy of sublingual Misoprostol versus intramuscular Methylergometrine in prevention of primary postpartum hemorrhage after delivery.

Study Design: Quasi experimental study

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Gynae/Obs, Military Hospital and Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi cantt. December 2007 to July 2008.

Material and Methods: One hundred and thirty six pregnant ladies were selected. On arrival each patient was examined thoroughly along with baseline investigations. Therapeutic option was allocated to the patients simply by using a table of random numbers and dividing them in two equal groups. Informed written consent was taken. Each patient was observed for blood loss estimation and hematocrit drop. All the data was analyzed using SPSS version 10.0. Mean ± SD for age, pre-delivery and post-delivery hematocrit, percentage of drop in hematocrit and blood loss during labour was calculated.

Results: Mean drop of hematocrit and blood loss were compared among two groups. At the end, it was revealed that there was no significant difference among two groups in blood loss (p=0.49) and hematocrit drop (p=0.14).

Conclusion: There is no significant better effect in preventing post partum hemorrhage among the two drugs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2013

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Anwar R, Mushtaq M, Anwer A, Khalil AA. EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR METHYLERGOMETRINE IN PREVENTION OF PRIMARY POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2013 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];63(3):309-14. Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/2184